- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 26 August 2010
- Bench
- Shiv Narayan Dhingra
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 2331/2010
Judgment
ORDER o/o
26.08.2010 This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been preferred by the petitioners for quashing of FIR No.156 of 2005 under Sections 354/509/452/323/34 IPC of Police Station Seemapuri, Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom. It was a matter of eve teasing where the girl Ms. Babita (respondent no.3) was molested by the accused persons/petitioners herein and when the act was objected to by the parents of the girl and neighbours, they were beaten by the petitioners. The mother of the girl Smt. Pushpa Rani (respondent no.2) is present in the CourL and submits that the girl thereafter got married and delivered a child about ten days back. They do not want that the girl should be called to the court and is harassed because of pendency of the present case. She submits that she was the complainant and on her instance the present FIR was registered. The neighbours who were injured by the accused persons/petitioners had also compromised the matter. She does not want furLher harassment by repeated visits to coufts, a R. Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. _-t.L, F Considering the attitude and behavior and acts on the part of petitioners, I do not think it is a fit case for quashing of FIR. However, the petitioners, in view of the compromise arrived ot, are given benefit of probation. It is therefore directed that in case the petitioners execute a bond of good behavior to the tune of Rs.25,000/- each for a period of two years with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of concerned trial courL, Police station seema Puri, fufther proceedings emanating from present FIR shall not be carried out. With above order, the petition stands disposed of. SHIV NARAYAN D}TfNGRA,J AUGUST 2q 2OrO rd a
4.
Case details
Parties and counsel
\ $-1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + cRL.M.C. 2337/2010 MANMOHAN @ MUKESH & ORS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Margwbitusais, Advocate VCTSUS STATE & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for State CORAM: JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.