Sunita v. Sachin Sharma & Ors

/ ' .... * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUN ITA MACA No.636/2010 Date of Decision: September 24, 2010 ..... Appellant through Mr. 5 N Parashar, Advocate versus SACHIN SHARMA AND ORS. .. ... Respondents through Ms. Suman Bagga, Advocate for Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary, Advocate for Respondent no.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MISS JUSTICE REKHA SHARMA

¶1Whether the reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶2To be referred to the reporter or not?

¶3Whether the judgment should be reported in the 'Digest'? REKHA SHARMA, I. (ORAL) The appellant has preferred this appeal against the impugned award dated April 15, 2010 whereby a total compensation 25,000/- has been awarded to the appellant on account of injury suffered by her in a road accident. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant had sustained grievous injuries and had remained in the hospital for 3 days yet only 5,000/- has been awarded to her on account of pain and suffering. MACA 636/2010 w r • rv w w ) Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. • • I I t w . Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the Insurance Company is directed to pay another sum 5,000/- to the appellant towards pain and suffering along with interest thereon @ 7.5% per annum. With this direction, the appeal is disposed of. SEPTEMBER 24, 2010 PC. MACA 636/2010 HARMA, J ')_