Laurel Wood Pvt. Ltd. & Ors v. State Govt. of NCT & Ors

ORDER %

04.10.2012 Present two petitions have been filed under Section 482 Cr. P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No. 14/2008 registered with Police Station Economic Offences Wing, Delhi under Sections 406/420/409/120B IPC on the groundthat the matterhas been amicablyresolvedbetweenthe parties. Learned counsel for the parties in Crl.M.C. 2295/2012 have drawn attentionof this Court to MemorandumofUnderstanding(MOU) dated 2"'' June, 2012 executed betweenthe parties. They point out that on the basis of the said settlement,petitioner-accusedhad been admittedto bail by learned AdditionalSessions Judge-II, Outer District, Rohini Courts, Delhi on 2"^* June, 2012. Present petitions for quashing are supported by affidavit and no objectioncertificate of respondentno. 2-complainant. Mr. Satish Kumar, respondentno. 2-complainantis personallypresentin Courtand he has been identified by lO/SI Ajeet Kumar. He states today he has received the balance sum of ^ 10,000/- by way of a demand draft bearing No. 001605 dated6^ September,2012 drawnuponHDFC BankLtd., K.G. Marg,New CRL.M.C. 2910/2012 & 2295/2012 Delhi in full and final settlement of his dues as mentioned in aforesaid MOU. It is pertinentto mentionthat the aforesaiddemand draft has been furnishedby petitioner-M/s.LaurelWood Pvt. Ltd. Mr. SatishKumar also states that in view of the settlement he is not interested in pursuing the aforesaid FIR. Mr. Satish Kumar, respondenton. 2/complainantalso undertakesto this Court that he would withdraw the civil suit being CS(OS) No. 2072/2009 pending before Original Side of this Court on or before 12"' October, 2012. The aforesaidundertakingis acceptedby this Court and Mr. Satish Kumar and M/s. Swastik HealthcareServices Pvt. Ltd. are bound by the same. Consequently,this Court sees no purpose in continuingthe present proceedingsany further and accordingly,FIR No. 14/2008registeredwith Police Station Economic Offences Wing, Delhi under Sections 406/420/ 409/120B IPC as well as any other consequentialproceedings arising therefrom are quashed. At this stage, learned counsel for parties voluntarily states that Mr. SachinKumarSaraf,M/s. LaurelWood Pvt. Ltd. and Mr. SatishKumar would deposit?50,000/-each with Delhi Legal ServicesAuthoritywithin two weeks. The aforesaid statementsare accepted by this Court.^ The petitionsstanddisposedofinthe aforesaidterms. Order dasti. MANMOBKNTT' OCTOBER 04, 2012 m CRL.M.C. 2910/2012&2295/2012 ^

$- * 3. + u #3 &5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2910/2012 SACHIN KUMAR SARAF Through versus STATE & ANR Through CRL.M.C. 2295/2012 Petitioner Mr. Vinod Sharma, Advocate. Petitioner in person. Respondents Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for State with SI Ajeet Kumar, EOW, DelhiPolice. Mr. Anil Soni with Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Advocates for R-2/ Complainant. Mr. Satish Kumar, R-2/Complainant in person. AND LAUREL WOOD PVT. LTD. & ORS Petitioners Through Mr. S.K. Sharmawith Mr. Puneet Relan, Mr. Prayas Aneja and Mr. Milan Deep Singh, Advocates versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT & ORS. Respondents Through Mr. Manoj Ohri,APP for Statewith SIAjeetKumar, EOW, DelhiPolice. CRL.M.C. 2910/2012 & 2295/2012 Page l of3 Mr. Anil Soni with Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Advocates for R-2/ Complainant. Mr. Satish Kumar, R-2/Complainant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN