VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2016 › High Court of Delhi

Parvati Holdings Pvt. Ltd v. E.T. Infra Developers Pvt Limited & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
16 November 2016
Bench
S.Muralidharauthor
Case no.
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 109/2016

Judgment

O R D E R %

13.01.2017

IA No. 431/2017 (u/O 39 R 2A CPC) in OMP (I) (COMM) 73/2016 IA No. 430/2017 (u/O 39 R 2A CPC) in OMP (I) (COMM) 109/2016

¶1Considering that the order of which the disobedience is alleged, is a final order disposing of the main petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, the Court is of the view the present applications should be converted into contempt petitions and be listed before the Roster Bench.

¶2The Registry will accordingly renumber both these applications as civil contempt petitions and list them before the Roster Bench on 27th January 2017, subject to the orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice.

¶3Learned counsel appearing on advance notice for Respondents states that he has not received copies of the said applications. The same be served upon by learned counsel for the Applicant/Petitioner upon him within three days.

S. MURALIDHAR, J JANUARY 13, 2017 Rm

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 73/2016 RADICO KHAITAN FINANCE LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Pratham Sharma with Mr. Jeevesh Nagrath, Advocates. versus E.T. INFRA DEVELOPERS PVT. LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Akhilesh Arora, Advocate And + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 109/2016 PARVATI HOLDINGS PVT LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Pratham Sharma with Mr. Jeevesh Nagrath, Advocates. versus E.T. INFRA DEVELOPERS PVT. LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Akhilesh Arora, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.