VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2016 › High Court of Delhi

Shri Raj Kumar Arora v. M/S Habitat India & Anothers

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
27 October 2016
Bench
Rajiv Sahai Endlawauthor
Case no.
TR.P.(C) 15/2016

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Rajiv Sahai Endlaw

Judgment

O R D E R %

27.10.2016

¶1The petitioner by this petition under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) seeks transfer of a suit filed by the petitioner against the three respondents and earlier pending in this Court and transferred to the Court of the District Judge (South-East), Saket Courts, New Delhi, to District Judge (South), Saket Courts, New Delhi, contending that the office of the respondent No.1 who is the only contesting defendant in the suit falls in the territorial jurisdiction of District Judge (South) and not District Judge (South-East).

¶2Notice of the petition was issued. Only the respondent No.1 has been served and appears. The report of service of respondent No.2 is awaited and the notice issued to the respondent No.3 has been returned unserved with the endorsement that the respondent No.3 has left the premises.

¶3The counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff has however filed an affidavit of service of the respondents No.2&3 as well. TR.P.(C) 15/2016

¶4I have enquired from the counsel for the petitioner, whether the learned Additional District Judge (South-East), Saket Courts, New Delhi before whom the suit is now pending has taken any objection as to the territorial jurisdiction of that Court.

¶5The reply is in the negative.

¶6The counsel for the respondent No.1 states that he has no objection to the suit being tried in the Court in which it is already pending.

¶7In this view of the matter and in exercise of the power under Section 24 of CPC, it is ordered that Civil Suit No.96/2016 may proceed in the Court of Additional District Judge / District Judge (South-East), Saket Courts, New Delhi.

¶8The transfer petition is disposed of.

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J. OCTOBER 27, 2016 bs..

TR.P.(C) 15/2016

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + TR.P.(C) 15/2016 RAJ KUMAR ARORA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kailash Chandra, Adv. Versus M/S HABITAT INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Pushkar Taimni, Adv. for D-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.