- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 25 November 2011
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 2646/2011
Judgment
ORDER %
25.11.2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 138/2011, under Sections IPC, registered at P.S. Alipur on the ground that the parties have inter se compromised the matter. FIR was registered on the complaint of the respondent No. 2 Khadag Singh against the petitioners. Respondent No. 3 Brij Pal was also the injured in the incident. Petitioners are present in person. They are identified by their counsel. Respondents No. 2 & 3 are also present and are identified by the Investigating officer. The respondent No. 2, who is the complainant and the petitioners state Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. that they have compromised the matter and now there is no dispute left. Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 states that they have compromised the matter with the petitioners out of their own free will and volition and without any pressure or coercion of any sort and now, they are left with no grievance against the petitioners and they have no objection if the present FIR is quashed. In view of the foregoing and the fact that the parties have amicably resolved all their disputes, no useful purpose would be served by continuing with the FIR. Accordingly, FIR No. 138/2011, under Sections 308/34 IPG, registered at P.S. Alipur and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom are herby quashed. Bail bonds of the petitioners are cancelled and their sureties are discharged. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. NOVEMBER 25, 2011 akb M.L. MEHTA,J
Case details
Parties and counsel
$-29 * IN THE fflGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2646/2011 NAVEEN @ NARENDER SINGH & ORS Petitioner Through: Petitioners in person with Mr. Kailash Chandra, Advocate. versus STATE & ANR Respondent Through: Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP with the Investigating Officer in person. Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.