Shiwam Kumar v. Union Public Service Commission and Anr

O R D E R %

12.11.2024

¶1The learned counsel for the respondents submits that the case of the petitioner would be covered by the judgment dated

08.07.2024 passed by the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.3303/2015 titled Union of India v. Pankaj Kumar Srivastava & Anr.

¶2Based on the above statement, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing further survives in the present petition. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.

¶3At this stage, we may note that the learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that the respondents have moved an This is a digitally signed order. application before the Supreme Court seeking extension of time to implement the judgment. The judgment, as far as the petitioner is concerned, may also be implemented within the extended time, if granted by the Supreme Court.

¶4In case the judgment is not implemented, the petitioner would be at liberty to take appropriate recourse in accordance with law. NAVIN CHAWLA, J SHALINDER KAUR, J NOVEMBER 12, 2024 RN/as Click here to check corrigendum, if any This is a digitally signed order.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4543/2014 & CM APPL. 42743/2023 SHIWAM KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Avadh Bihari Kaushik, Ms.Saloni Mahajan, Mr.Prateek Goyal, Mr.Rishabh Kumar, Advs. versus UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr.Ravinder Agarwal, Mr.Lekh Raj Singh, Advs. for R-1. Mr.R.Khatana, Adv. for Mr.Kirtiman Singh, CGSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR