Hind Plastics Industries v. Indian Sulphacide Industries Ltd

ORDER %

27.10.2009 The counsel for the petitioner states that the suits from which t ~.ese petitions have arisen have since been decided by the Trial Court and hence these petitions preferred with respect to the orders made duringi the pendency of the suits have become intructuous. It is further stated that the petitioner shall avail the remedies available in law with respect tol the grievances in these petitions. The counsel f6r the respondents has I no objection to the petitions being disposed of as aforesaid except for the th payment of costs imposed on 18 April, 2009. The counsel for the petitioner states that the costs shall be paid The petitions and all!the pending applications are disposed of. OCTOBER 27,2009 gsr EINDLAW4 Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

13&14 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) No. 1225/2 007 & CM(M) No. 1229/2007 HIND PLASTICS INDUSTRIES ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Nisha Sethi Sudan, Advocate versus - I i INDIAN SULPHACIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pawan Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW