VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Prit Pal Singh v. State &Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
23 August 2011
Bench
Badar Durrez Ahmbd, Veena Birbal
Case no.
W.P.(CRL) 1150/2011

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Badar Durrez AhmbdFollow Veena Birbal

Judgment

ORDER

23.08.2011 'Ihe petitioner's daughter Amandeep Kaur is present in court. She has clearly stated both in open court as well as in chambers, that she wants to continue to reside with her husband Vicky @ Mohd. Arshad. In these circumstances, no further directions are necessary in this writ petition except to record that the certificates and other documents pertaining to Amandeep Kaur shall be handed over by the petitioner's counsel to the counsel appearing on behalf of Amandeep Kaur and her husband. The same shall be done within a week' Vicky @ Mohd. Arshad is also present in court and he has assured us that he will take good care of his wife Amandeep Kaur and there shall be no reason for any comp,aint. Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. The Station House Officer of Police Station Gandhi Nagar will ensure that no untoward incident takes place. In view of above, the writ petition stands disposed of' BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J /rftpuPry VEENA BIRBAL.f,--J AUGUST 23.2OII " srb

Case details

Parties and counsel

L- e a $- 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + w.P.(cRL) l 150/201 1 PRI'T PAL SINGH ..... Petitioner Through Mr Pradeep Kumar Arya, Advocate VCTSUS STATE & ORS ""' ResPondent Through Mr Pawan Sharma, St. Counsel Mr Mizamuddin, Advocate for AmandeeP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMBD HON'BLE MS JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.