VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2009 › High Court of Delhi

Sagar Mehra v. Delhi Techological University

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
31 August 2009
Bench
Anil Kumarauthor
Case no.
W.P.(C) 10568/2009

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Anil Kumar

Judgment

ANIL KUMAR, J. (ORAL) *

This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to the respondent to admit the petitioner to the course of Master of Engineering (Structural Engineering) for the academic session 2009-2010. The petitioner has also sought an inquiry into the alleged malpractice in admission process.

Learned counsel for the respondent contends that the petitioner has been granted admission in the course of Master of Engineering (Structural Engineering) for academic session 2009-2010. Consequently, the relief of the petitioner seeking admission to the W.P.(C.) No.10568/2009

course of Master of Engineering (Structural Engineering) for academic sessions 2009-2010 does not survive.

As far as the relief for holding an inquiry into the alleged malpractice in the admission process, considering the pleas and contentions raised by the parties, the case of alleged malpractice is not made on the basis of the averments made by the petitioner. The relief of inquiry into the alleged malpractice is, therefore, declined.

The writ petition is disposed of. Parties are left to bear their own costs.

August 31, 2009

ANIL KUMAR, J. 'Dev'

Case details

Parties and counsel

W.P.(C.) No.10568/2009 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C.) No.10568/2009 % Date of Decision: 31.08.2009 Shri Sagar Mehra …. Petitioner Through Mr.Raman Duggal, Advocate Versus Delhi Technological University …. Respondent Through Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR 1. Whether reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.