- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 25 November 2011
- Bench
- M.L. Mehta
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 2801/2011
Judgment
ORDER
25.11.2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 100/2010, under Sections 452/342/354/427/506/34 IPC, registered at P.S. Govind Puri on the ground that the parties have inter se compromised the matter. FIR was registered on the complaint of the respondent No.2 Parmita Bajaj. Both the parties are present in person and are identified by their respective counsels. The respondent No. 2, who is the complainant and the petitioners state that they have compromised the matter and now there is no dispute left. Respondent No. 2 states that she has compromised the matter with the petitioners out of her own free will and volition and without any ' -;,-! i ! ' I I Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. -"' pressure or coercion of any sort and now, the respondents are left with no , grievance against the petitioners and they have no objection if the present FIR is quashed. In view of the foregoing and the fact that the parties have amicably resolved all their disputes, no useful purpose would be served by continuing with the FIR. Accordingly, FIR No.1 00/2010, under Sections 452/342/354/427/506/34 IPC, registered at P.S. Govind Puri and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom are herby quashed. Bail bonds of the petitioners are cancelled and their sureties are discharged. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. NOVEMBER 25, 2011 akb M.L. MEHTA,J
1.1, I :·
Case details
Parties and counsel
) * IN THE IDGH COURT OF DELID AT NEW DELHI + % CRL.M.C. 2801/2011 KARTAR SINGH & ORS Through: versus STATE&ORS ..... Petitioner Petitioners in person with Mr. D.K.Rai, Advocate. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Jasbirleaur,APP. CORAM: R2 to R4 in person with Mr.le.N.Mahaseth, Advocate. HON'BLE :MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.