VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Anil Kumar Bisht v. Ndmc and Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
24 October 2011
Bench
Hima Kohliauthor
Case no.
W.P.(C) 6123/2011

Judgment

% c IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on : 21.09.2011 Pronounced on:

24.10.2011 + W.P.fC^ 4347/2011. 4559/2011. 4593/2011-4610/2011 4650/2011. 4651/2011, 4827/2Q11, 4923/2011-5024/2011 5028/2011. 4775/2011. 5247/2011-5254/2011. 5255/2011 5257/2011. 525S/2011, 5261/2011. 5-26^/2011. 5263/2011 5264/2011. 5277/2011. 5292/2011. 5312/2011. 5317/2011 5402/2011. 5403/2011. 5405/2011. 5408/2011. 5410/2011 5411/2011. 5413/2011. 5418/2011, 5423/2011. 5444/2011 5473/2011. 5484/2011, 5485/2011. 5497/2011. 5498/2011 5503/2011, 5504/2011. 5505/2011-5506/2011. 5507/2011 5508/2011. 5595/2011. 5614/2011. 5615/2011. 5616/2011 5618/2011. 5627/2011. 5630/2011, 5631/2011. 5643/2011 5645/2011. 5654/2011. 5656/2011. 5711/2011- ^ w >L J. r 5717/2011 5718/2011. 5728/2011. 5729/2011. 5731/2011. M Jim tf M 5732/2011 5737/2011. 5738/2011. 5739/2011. 5743/2011-5761/2011 5784/2011. 5785/2011. 5791/2011. 5794/2011. 5797/2011 5798/2011. 5822/2011. 5911/2011. 5918/2011. 5928/2011 5931/2011. 5933/2011. 5934/2011. 5935/2011. 5957/2011 59S5/2011. 5966/2011. 5967/2011. 5968/2011. 5969/2011 5970/2011. 5974/2011. 6096/2011. 6100/2011. 6101/2011 6102/2011. S107/201J. 6108/211. 6114/2011. 6115/2011 6116/2011. 6117/2011. 6118/2011. 6119/2011. 6120/2011 6121/2011. 6122/2011. 6123/2011. 6144/2011. 6250/2011 6270/2011. 6271/2011. 6449/2011. 6527/2011. 6528/2011. 6529/2011. 6530/2011 6531/2011 6532/2011. 6533/2011, 6534/2011. 6538/2011. 6555/2011. 6667/2011. 6668/2011. 6669/2011. 6670/2011. 6684/2011. 6701/2011. 5173/2011. 4739/2011. 5046/2011. 5051/2011. 5157/2011. 4649/2011 4722/2011. 260172011. 2602/2011. 3052/2011. 3181/2011. 3185/2011. 3189/2011. 3196/2011. 4340/2011. 4342/2011. 4343/2011. 4344/2011. 4345/2011. 4349/2011. 4350/2011 4352/2011. 4354/2011. 4356/2011. 4358/2011. 4359/2011 4360/2011. 4361/2011. 4362/2011. 4363/2011. 4364/2011 4355/2011. 4366/2011, 4367/2011. 4368/2011. 4369/2011 4370/2011. 4371/2011-4372/2011. 4373/2011. 4374/2011. 4375/2011. 4377/2011. 4387/2011. 4388/2011. 4389/2011. 4391/2011. 4392/2011. 4393/2011. 4395/2011. 4396/2011. -4398/2011. 4398/2011. 4399/2011. 4400/2011. 4402/2011. 4404/2011. 4405/2011. 4406/2011. 4407/2011. 4408/2011 4409/2011. 4410/2011. 4412/2011. 4413/2011. -r-Twm/ Amxxf 4414/2011. 5341/2011. 4847/2011. 4859/2011. 4887/2011. 4990/2011, W-P.(C)4347/2011andconnectedmatters Page1of8 Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. I 5063/2011, 5089/2011. 5099/2011. 5114/2011. 511^/?nii 5117/2Q11, 5129/2011. 5139/2011. 5144/2011. 6708/2011. 6799/2011, 6824/2011. 6825/2011. 6826/2011. 6827/2011. 6896/2011, 6901/2011. 6902/2011. 6903/2011. 69Q4/:?nil 6905/2011, 6906/2011. 6907/2011. 6908/2011. 6909/2011. 6910/2011, 6917/2011. 6919/2011. 6920/2011. 6921/2011. 6922/2011. 6932/2011 and 5420/2011? m THE MATTERS OF MOHD. AZAD ^ Petitionerin W.P.(C)4347/2011 MOHD. ALAM Petitionerin W.P.(C) 4559/2011 KIRPALSINGH Petitionerin W.P.(C)4593/2011 SHAILENDERKUMAR Petitionerin W.P.(C)4610/2011 SANJAY Petitionerin W.P.(C) 4650/2011 Petitioner in V\/.P.(C) 4651/2011 AMAR NATH SINGH Petitionerin W.P.(C)4827/2011 GANESH PRASAD Petitionerin W.P.(C) 4923/2011 BHUPALSINGH Petitionerin W.P,(C) 5024/2011 SURENDERSINGH AND ORS. Petitionersin W.P.(C) 5028/2011 Petitioner in W.P.(C) 4775/2011 RAKESH KUMAR AND ORS. Petitionersin W.P.(C) 5247/2011 RAM DASS Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5254/2011 VISHAMBARJHA Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5255/2011 DINESH KUMAR Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5257/2011 Petitioner in W.P.(C) 5258/2011 RAJESH CGUPTA AND ORS. Petitionersin W.P.(C) 5261/2011 LAKHPATIAND ORS. Petitionersin W.P.(C) 5262/2011 SOHAN LAL AND ORS. ..... Petitionersin W.P.(C) 5263/2011 Petitioner in W.P.(C) 5264/2011 ARUN KUMAR ALIAS LUCKY Petitionerin V\/.P.(C)5277/2011 MITHU LAL Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5292/2011 MOHD. ZAHID Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5312/2011 SHAKEELAHMED Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5317/2011 NAND KISHORE Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5402/2011 RINKU KUMAR GUPTA Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5403/2011 HARJEET KAUR Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5405/2011 NARESH KUMAR RAO AND ORS Petitionersin W.P.(C) 5408/2011 ..... Petitioner in W.P.(C) 5410/2011 NABI HASAN Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5411/2011 HARENDERPRASAD Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5413/2011 BHUPINDERSINGH Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5418/2011 GOVIND SINGH AND ANR. Petitionersin W.P.(C) 5423/2011 BAL CHAND GUPTA Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5444/2011 MUNNA THAKUR@RAMESH THAKUR Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5^173/2011 W.P.(C)4347/2011and connectedmatters Page2of8 SuLDTslNGr "S484/2011 DHARAM VEER S'NCH Petitionerin W.P,(C) 5485/2011 MAHKH PAI^SINGI? Petitionerin W.P.fC)5497/2011 RAJ RAIMI Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5498/2011 DULICHAND Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5503/2011 SHAI^TA RAM Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5504/2011 MmER PAL nl'l'!"""'"5505/2011 Dm". Petitionerin W.P.(C)5506/2011 TARUiM'tSm? PetitionecJfaM^O5502/2011 RAVIIMDERKUMAR Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5508/2011 Dineshyadav • Petitionerin W.P.(C)5595/2011 RAMBAHADIJR PetitionerinW.P.(C)5614/2011 AI^ILW^TaRA)PTA Petitionerin W.P.(C)5615/2011 RAM AWAR Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5616/2011 SHAiVlKARLAL Petitionerin W.P,(C)5618/2011 PADAM SMGH Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5627/2011 MEFMA Petitionerin W.P.fC) 5630/2011 MOHH hasiviat Petitionerin W.P.fC) 5631/2011 VIPII^'prASAID• Petitionerin W.P.fC) 5643/2011 SUSHIL KUMAR GUPTA Petitionerin W.P.fC) 5645/2011 BABU KHAN Petitionerin W.P.fC) 5654/2011 VIJAY KUMAR Petitionerin W.P.fC) 5656/2011 vijAY KUMAR Petitioner in W.P.rn 5711/7ni i PRmA SWGIh'^PANDEY Petitionerin W.P.fC)5717/2011 PURANCHAwn Petitionerin W.P.fC) 5718/2011 OH^R GUPTA ••••• W.P.fC)5728/2011 KUMFR Petitionerin W.P.fC) 5729/2011 RAIENDfr Petitionerin W.P.fC) 5731/2011 Petitioner in W.P.(C) 5732/2011 KARAN VTR Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5737/2011 MATA PRaLd YAHAV Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5738/2011. RARM YADAV Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5739/2011 RAMESH riHAMn "•••• W.P.(C) 5743/2011 Ia^Tmt Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5751/2011 Petitioner in W.P.(C) 5784/2011 RAM Petitionerin W.P.fC) 5785/2011 NAVIn's^GH Petitionerin W.P.fC)5791/2011 Petitioner in W.P.(C) 5794/2011 YADAV Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5797/2011 Petitioner in W.P.(C) 5798/2011 MiMiL biiMoH Petitioner in W.P.(C) 5822/2011 i^IRANJAN DEV Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5911/2011 KLLDEEP SiHANKLA Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5918/2011 SURENDERKHURANA (g) NEERU Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5928/2011 SURESH BABU Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5931/2011 W.P.(C) 4347/2011 and connected matters GULSHAN KUMAR PAWAN KUMAR SUBHASH SHRIVASTAV r-lAM RAJ AJAY KUMAR RAMESH CHANDER @ RAMESH VINOD KHANA KISHAN LAL MOHAN LAL SANJEEV KUMAR GUPTA PRADEEP GUPTA RAM KUMAR SUNEHRI LAL BHAGIRATHI CHOURASIYA MOHO. SHARIQ KARUNA SHANKAR PANDEY VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA MD. SHAMSHAD ALAM VIRENDER TRILOK CHAND VINOD SALIM KHAN SATYA PRAKASH SANJAY KAUSHIK REHMAT ALI KHAN INDULESH ANIL KUMAR BISHT KAMLESH DEVI YADAV CHARAN SINGH ARUN SINGH SATISH KUMAR PUSHKARNA SHIV NARAIN SAHU CHAND KAPOOR JITENDER KUMAR RAJ KUMAR PAPPU BASANT LAL TIWARI NEPAL SINGH SURENDER SAINI BHAWANI SINGH MOHAN PRASAD GUPTA RAM KISHAN LALA RAM PRAKASH BALWANT SINGH Petitioner in W.P.(C) Petttt©n€f4n Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner CHAND. Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner ..... Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner ..... Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner .!... Petitioner Petitioner n W.P.(C) n W.P.(C) n W.P.(C) n W.P.(C) n W.P.(C) n W.P.(C) n W.P.(C) n W.P.(C) n W.P.(C) n W.P.(C) n W.P.(C) n W.P.(C) n W.P.(C) n W.P.(C) n W.P.(C) n W.P.(C) n W.P.(C) n W.P.(C) n W.P.(C) n W.P.(C) n W.P.(C) n W.P.(C) n W.P.(C) n W.P.(C) n W.P.(C) n W.P.(C) n W.P.(C) n.W.P.(C) n W.P.(C) n W.P.(C) W.P.(C) W.P.(C) W.P.(C) W.P.(C) W.P.(C) W.P.(C) W.P.(C) Petitioner in W.P.(C) Petitioner in W.P.(C) Petitioner in W.P.(C) Petitioner in W.P.(C) Petitioner in W.P.(C) Petitioner in W.P.(C) W,P.(C} 4347/2011 and connected matters 5933/201 5934/2011 5935/2011 5957/2011 5965/2011 5966/2011 5967/2011 5968/2011 5969/2011 5970/2011 5974/2011 6096/2011 6100/2011 6101/2011 6102/2011 6107/2011 6108/2011 6114/2011 6115/2011 6116/2011 6117/2011 6118/2011 6119/2011 6120/2011 6121/2011 5122/2011 6123/2011 6144/2011 6250/2011 6270/2011 6271/2011 6449/2011 6527/2011 6528/2011 6529/2011 6530/2011 6531/2011 6532/2011 5533/2011 6534/2011 6538/2011 6555/2011 6667/2011 6668/2011 6569/2011 DINESH Petitioner in W.P.(C) 6670/2011 KISHORI l_AL Petitioner in W.P.(C) 6684/2011 BACHU SIIMGH Petitioner in W.P.(C) 6701/2011 ANIL KUMAR Petitioner in W.P.(C) 5173/2011 SURESH GUPTA Petitioner in W.P.(C) 4739/2011 RAJ BAHADUR Petitioner in W.P.(C) 5046/2011 MAHENDRA PRASAD AND ORS Petitioners in W.P.(C) 5051/2011 raMU Petitioner in W.P.(C) 5157/2011 SIMANT SHARMA Petitioner in W.P.(C) 4649/2011 RAM SINGH AND ORS. Petitioners in W.P.(C) 4722/2011 VINAY KUMAR Petitioner in W.P.(C) 2601/2011 SATYA NARAYAN SHARMA Petitioner in W.P.(C) 2602/2011 ROHAN SHARMA Petitioner in W.P.(C) 3052/2011 KULDEEP SINGH AND ORS. Petitioners in W.P.(0)3181/2011 RAM PRAKASH Petitioner in W.P.(C) 3185/2011 SURAJ SINGH Petitioner in W.P.(C) 3189/2011 VEER SINGH ••••• Petitioner in W.P.(C) 3196/2011 SURENDRASINGH Petitioner in W.P.(C) 4340/2011 UShA Petitioner in W.P.(C) 4342/2011 SUBHASH Petitioner in W.P.(G) 4343/2011 DASU RAM YADAV Petitioner in W.P.(C) 4344/2011 SURENDER Petitionerin W.P.(C) 4345/2011 LOKENDER Petitionerin W.P.(C) 4349/2011 SUNITA Petitionerin W.P.(C) 4350/2011 BHAGWATSWAROOPGUPTA Petitionerin W.P.(C) 4352/2011 SHAKAL SINGH Petitionerin W.P.(C)4354/2011 NARENDER KUMAR Petitionerin W.P.(C) 4356/2011 BRD PAL Petitionerin W.P.(C) 4358/2011 p^jL) Petitionerin W.P.(C) 4359/2011 ASHOK ' Petitionerin W.P.(C) 4360/2011 JAI CHHABCj\ Petitionerin W.P.(C)4361/2011 BINDU DEVI Petitionerin W.P.(C) 4362/2011 MOHD. MUZAHID AND ANR. Petitionersin W.P.(C)4363/2011 KAMLESH UJJAINWAL Petitionerin W.P.(C) 4364/2011 KTSHAN Petitionerin W.P.(C) 4365/2011 DEVI CHARAN Petitionerin W.P.(C)4366/2011 AM1M Petitioner in V\/.P.(C)4367/2011 chobHA Petitionerin W.P.(C) 4368/2011 IFFT SFHGAL Petitionerin W.P.(C)4369/2011 POoVam RANA Petitionerin W.P.(C)4370/2011 YUSUF KHAN PetitionermWP. C) 4371/2011 cmamtt Petitioner in W.P.(C) 4372/2011 BASANTI AND ORS. Petitioners RAJ KUMARI Petitionerin WP. C) 4374/2011 Petitioner in W.P.(C) 4375/2011 I W.P.(C)4347/2011 snd connected matters PageS of 8 S.^ I \ LA7A Petitioner in W.P.(C) 4377/2011 HARISH KUI^TO Petitionerin W.P.(C>4387/2011 OM PRAKASH PATHAK Petitioner in W.P.(C) 4388/2011 GOVIND PRASAD GUPTA Petitioner in W.P.(C) 4389/2011 ANIS AHMED Petitioner in W.P.(C) 4391/2011 MOHD. KHURSHID Petitioner in W.P.(C) 4392/2011 SAMARTH PRASAD YADAV Petitioner in W.P.(C) 4393/2011 MADAN SINGH RAWAT AND ANR Petitioners in W.P.(C) 4395/2011 MOHD. IMRAN ..... PetitionerIn W.P.(C) 4396/2011 GANPAT RAI Petitioner in W.P.(C) 4397/2011 BHURA YADAV Petitioner in W.P.(C) 4398/2011 ARUN KUMAR BANSAL Petitioner in W.P.(C) 4399/2011 RAVINDER@ RAVI Petitioner in W.P.(C) 4400/2011 SANJAY KUMAR GUPTA Petitioner in W.P.(C) 4402/2011 HARfSH CHAND Petitioner in W.P.(C) 4404/2011 PRAMOD Petitioner in W.P.(C) 4405/2011 VDAY KUMAR SINGH Petitioner in W.P.(C) 4406/2011 JAIVIRSINGH Petitionerin W.P.(C) 4407/2011 ASHOK JAISWAL Petitioner in W.P.(C) 4408/2011 DALIP KUMAR GUPTA Petitioner in W.P.(C) 4409/2011 AMIRUDIN Petitioner in W.P.(C) 4410/2011 LAXMAN Petitioner in W.P.(C) 4412/2011 jAi SINGH PAL ..... Petitioner in W.P.(C) 4413/2011 ASHOK KUMAR YADAV Petitioner in W.P.(C) 4414/2011 MOHD. ALI Petitioner in W.P.(C) 5341/2011 CHOTTE [_AL Petitionerin W.P.(C) 4847/2011 SYED RIZWAN ALI Petitioner in W.P.(C) 4859/2011 MANOJ KUMAR Petitionerin W.P.(C) 4887/2011 RAJA BABU Petitioner in W.P.(C) 4990/2011 PAWAN KUMAR GUPTA AND ORS Petitionersin W.P.(C) 5063/2011 MEE'I^A DEVI Petitioner in W.P.(C) 5089/2011 GUDIYA @GUDDI Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5099/2011 RAJU SINGH Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5114/2011 SURA3 DEV PASWAN Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5115/2011 PANKAJ PANDEY Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5117/2011 BRD MOHAN ALIAS SASHI ..... Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5129/2011 PREM MASSEY Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5139/2011 CHANDER PAL SINGH ..... Petitionerin W.P.(C) 5144/2011 NARENDER KUMAR Petitionerin W.P.(C) 6708/2011 SHIV NANDAN PRASAD Petitionerin W.P.(C)6799/2011 PAWAN KUMAR Petitionerin W.P.(C)6824/2011 SAN3EEVAGGARWAL Petitionerin W.P.(C)6825/2011 SANTOSH AGGARWAL Petitionerin W.P.(C f826/2011 NARENDER KUMAR RAJ KUMAR Petitionerin W.P.(C)6896/2011 W.P.(C) 4347/2011 and connected matters ASHA RANI ND. TAIYAB MEENA DEVI MOHAMMAD IKRAMUL HAK SURAJ KUMAR PRAKASH CHAND MEENA RAVINDER KUMAR BIJENDER -ASHWNI KAPOOR JAMIRUDDIN Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner , Petitioner n W.P.(C) 6901/2011 n W.P.(C) 6902/2011 n W.P.(C) 6903/2011 n W.P.(C) 6904/2011 n W.P.(C) 6905/2011 n W.P.(C) 6906/2011 n W.P.(C) 6907/2011 n W.P.(C) 6908/2011 n W.P.(C) 6909/2011 n W.P.(C) 6910/2011 n W.P.ra 6917/2011 n W.P.(C) 6919/2011 n W.P.(C) 6920/2011 n W.P.(C) 6921/2011 n W.P.(C) 6922/2011 n W.P.(C) 6932/2011 n W.P.(C) 5420/2011 SHYAM SUNDER R/QdIV KUMAR MAHESH RAM KUMAR NAND UKL GUPTA SUSHIL KUMAR versus NDMC &ORS. . 'Respondents Present: Mr. B. B. Sawlnney, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ankan Suri, Mr. Lakshay Sawhney, Mr. Ankur Suri and Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocates for the petitioners. Mr. Sumit Kumar Singh, Mr. Anand Shailani, Mr. Satish Kumar Tripathi, Mr. N.K. Sahoo, Mr. R.N.Singh, Mr. M.R. Singh, Mr. Ramesh K. Mishra, Mr. Surender Pandit, Mr. Navjot Kumar, Mr. Mahendra Singh, Mr.Sunder Lai Juneja, Mr. Pranesh, Mr. B.B. Bhatia, Mr. Navjot Kumar and Mr. Satish Chand Gupta, Mr. Pranesh, Mr. Sahii Kapoor, Ms. S. Fatima, Mr. Jagdeep Kr. Sharma, Ms. Rani Chhabra, Ms. Rupinder Kaur, Ms. herida Satarawala, Mr. R.N. Singh, Mr. Vikas Batra, Mr. V.P. Rana and Mr. Navjot Kumar, Advocatesfor the petitioners. Ms. Madhu Tewatia, Ms. SidhI Arora, Mr. Vinod Kumar, Mr.Arjun Pant, Mr. Ashutosh Lohia and Mr. VInod Wadhwa, Advocates for the respondent/NDMC., Mr Najmi Wazirl, Standing Counsel, Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Mr. SanjaySahay, Ms. Farida SatarwalaChopra, Mr. Sachin Datta, Mr. AbhimanyuKumar and Ms. Rachna Saxena,Advocatesfor the respondent/GNCTD, ^.P.(C)4347/2011 and connected matters n Ms Navratan Chaudhary, Mr. H.S. Sachdeva, Mr. D. Rajeshwar Rao, Mr. Vikram Aggarwal and Mr. Shanq Mohammad,Advocatesfor the respondent/DeihiPolice. CORAM HON'BLE MS.3USTICE HIMA KOHLI

¶1Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?

¶2To be referred to the Reporter or not?

¶3Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? iCOHLI, J. For detailedjudgment,see WP(C) No.4743/2011. The Registryis directedto place a copy of the judgmentpassed in WF(C) 6^o.4743/2crrrirrtms me- ^ " (HIMA KOHLI) OCTOER 24'^ , 2011 JUDGE rkb W.P.(C)4347/2011 and connected matters ••T'- I I N THi,:; (.louiiTj-oi" i:"iiL',Li-irAr mbA/: ni:L ^• •^.LU.yr-O.L.l • I(esGrve'.i .w iji , , : rix)iiai.iricf?.(:|'c' )ri W-J\(C > 4 743 '/mil tiir>d'S254 /M 11 IN 'rNL; MAI !:£K3 OJ: (~.HOUDI-l/-\RY •li: [-elilkliiicr W,P.lC} W,P.;(d;) A'/A'M'.lAyV S215/1/;•!() I IJ A versus ons. V;; ;i'RFV-;|jd)nijenIs. ii'--!!/ / 20.11, '1!55.y/2011;.' 4;!;|93_/_2|)iid^ •4!;(!;51 /2oiI'l' -iiy /¥oI:l '5122^2oil,_ "ri(lils;i/ ;/«>!1, "51S7'/ 'IMM.L_.4:!l2'5/.2bjLl.,: ' 201l.I"^5020/201..JJ2S|i;Zj2:0 iij. /' 2011^: 526 ij_2o 11. :L5.252;/;'•"-! '• 5277/ 2011^ 52y|222«y)li;_"5312/^^ 531ZZfeoiJL,.:"..54 5403/201 ;1L 5420./201 :L,.,,,,5405.:Z'20;Li !;»'ill/201l!/'"3^«J3Z2!Uill,._:Slill •5''l!4'1l/20:ll:.li.,, 57/J/20 Lir ' ^03/2^1JU s504/^o1J,,._..._55057-2G11,j:'Ji^OG/li&y:,....S'S''.// '1^l Ir 5?VO0/2Oiir" 5535/2ID 25614/2011/ 5&15i;2J.:!U_,..:75'^ • . ... .. .. . •....' .. ..: -',.11 t: • .» • ,1" vll -:u /'• i-iri^ (|. il 56:ia:iif:mi i,_ _5iG^7/:2y11,. 5430/2011,;^^-^ 5iri^5/'20,i!'l7 5G54/201JjiO^ , 0/2011, 57-m/'2Qjl.15''j^"29/201. :ll7 "573ly!:2Q:1.1; ;5/::f2/20 ;il.J, ili.737 / 201 :i,, _5730/20li;.

573.9/2014;! .5743 /l^OI:,!. 5:.;"'Iv1/.201 .Jl;, yil .L,.:;..5643/7'0.^i;J. ,• 5ll.^. / 57;i.//20.IUl, Ui 11,2 .5 7! QiXl,.. .592B/20.!,1".

0.11,..^ 505 7/.20;iL:ll../ •!• 7S'1!/ 20.1.1;,,......5Z3J5/_20yL.l^5791 / 20.1l;;j 5794/2uj 570072011^ 5a22lZ;?^yLll.-.1.5^l:i1./ l^jJ »M' 5M3.1/ 20.1

5.^33 5i378:/.;boil,|l_.j5.t^ ^ / 20 :il Z20.I.I, 59G772Q11J' -59(5»./i.2PIjl.,,.,...5:060/ 20.11,.11, 5^;J'70/ 68396-/201l| GlOO/iZjy'.l.JU.'^ •?• ?,>2/ 2o11,Zj5.1QZ/2OjLL... lil 8;/:io.1.i.L^Gi1a:/!^iloil •"• .j'--• 'I- •"• •• 173 ^1/2011,.. .0:117 / 2011 61^.8 /.20 J. J.j 6119 /!201.1,.....0.120 / 20 Jl.1," G121/2011.' •6122/2011, :-6123/ 201l[ 6144/t2bjia.:.2'".^'^'.C?;/2Q.:in w27;y/20U..___6^71/20,l;.l0.^|;'!!A./g11 2Z&P4.,i7-.....C^52U/201.1,, §.52y,/20.11-....JG530/201.1,,'.^..&!|3.1.Z201.1 .§53Z£^ ly53-;ii/ 20jl..l" /;20 Jl,l,. ;6j:1jj'j.!'7/j70JL.! . 5;i73./!2

3.J 05./ -.m jl ]U.,.,..3lij;^i/^2!L)i11,_..,:3loo/ 201 ij., .:|.3;:i!0'/|:2 653 :^/!201 i. 6 53 3 / 20 j;1, ilii,.

3.jl.0'l/201.1l., [llJi.i , 434 2/2i[lil.i!., .vv -1''''-f3/'-H'.'.ii, >ijri^f/:.nn 1 «. f.imi'ni'A'ini.inii^tifii-k ' i-.y/jn r 111' jr, ; .'! I-1 Since •jLidgrnenl: oP Oourl: has so iPar 1101; Liggm iiriplernenLed,•iiiasrnljcl') as,-' aiDpropriate, 15Cj,islal.:i.ori lias nol: been enacled by Lhe;, compeLenl: JegislaLnre, we direct tl'ie parties toj rnainliain tlie status!, quo as il. is obtaining today." L , ' ! was tlie SLiiirnission,, of d:l"ie Isanied I counsel Tui' the :1, ", , ,• I • . • . ' respondent/NDMC that the aToresaid order issued by llhe Supiejiie. Court, calling upon the. parties to rnaintajn status quo ds obtaining on ! • • •• • • • " ' ' L.M.U / .^Ol.t,. can only be interpreted to mean that ttie-ipxtensive dii ei l.ioii.s , . I issue(.l earlier, on 08. i0..i.u:t0,•in ttie case of Gainda Pva'm fsuura) loiJorl.i.Ti.l ds (2010) 10 SGC 715 sliall CQintinu.e, to remain ir) o|.:ierati(;in, im ,li nlii ig ttie adjudicatory mechanism ijroA/ided•Por Liy tlie:NIDMC in tlie sclieme I: : •• • . piesented by it bePore the SujDrenie Court arid 'api-jrOved in l:lie said judgment, till the appropriate gbvernrnent enacts a law Por rcL)i.ilating Liiban street hawkers and, streel: venrlors. It was stated tliat simply ' because the-legislature-liasnot^eriacteda law in this rsgard on or.bePoie' OCj.^UJ.J, as directed in' tli:e apgresaid-judg-mept,. it cannnl. tie i..ontei'i(jedby the petitioners/vendoi-s that tliei'e exists a \/acuum aiK.l l.he srjid vacuum can no longer be Pilled djp by contihuirg 'to i'e.c|ulale lhe vending activitiesin the NDMC .jui:)sclictionin the manner as set out in (l,e afoi'esaid judgn-ient. . : i; . •, : ^ ^ "• To give a-bnef bgckgiojnd|of the dispute, leB.iniid.cuut.sel Iih II,r; i-esponder,t/l\ID|vicwalked tlils Coiit IJincuighsome f,,oniinGnl:decisions,,l ' IJie S,.ipron-,eCourt rendered from kime to lline, wlilclV relate to-pavo '•i ; . I 4343/2011, 4344/2011. 4345!/ 201 Iv 43149/ 20 :4:3,50:/20:1.1.-. / 7.01l":li• 4354/2011,. 4356S'''2011.. 4358/2011/ 43S9:/.Z» . 4360/2011"," 4361/2011. 43627 2011. VII3fe/2011, ' 4364/2011,.' 4365/2011. 4366/2011. 4367;/20li. 4368/2011. . 436«i/2011. 4370/MI 1._ 4371/2011. 4372/2011, ^373/2Qli.: •^137^!:/2011,.. 437 SjCZO11,. _. 437772011, 4337/2011, 4391/2011,, 4392/2011. •4391/2011... 4397/2011. 43'98/3011. 4399^72011.' •4^ «B/2'oiil ; 43S9/2011,.. ;Q5/^Qli. 4396/201. JL,,

¶11' 440(Glj!/2011. ; 4^•07/21013 4:4.i.8/2.0..1J./,. 4409/ 2011. 4410/ 2011. 4431.j/2011.:-f.4;^ L. • 4414/2P13U. 13/201: 50)63/2011> 5089/2011, '5 099172 01 iv ^5il4/20l'l. •' 5115/2011.: ,5117/2011. 5129/2011. 513S!;72011.' -:5i44/i0ll. ; -66677 20:IL 1, 6668/2011, 6669/2011. . 667d'/2011/' B^84/20li;' • 6703L/2013.L,, 6700/2011. 6799/2011. 6Q24:720li.-- 6^25/2:011.- • 6826/2011,. G}i27/2011. 6S96/.2011. 6901/2011. efeo 2/201 i. • 6903/2011., 6904/2011. 6905/2013U •• 69067 2011. •6907/20,11, . 6900/201.3!.., 6309/2011. 6910/2011, 69177.2011. . 6913/20;II,'1'" 6920/201:!},,, 6921/2011,, 69 22 / 201 i .• a mtib 6 9 3 2 / '2 a 11,. ••[•• • I'resei il Mr. B. 13. -SciwFiney, .Si|. Ad-viocalejwilh Mr'. Ai)l<.cin. Si 11 i, .Mr. Lakshay Sawhney, Mr!,, Ankjui .Si'iri anc'l Mir'. Siiiiil Ki ' ' ' ' Ad\/ocBl:es Por.die ijeUl.ieiler.s.. "" • ' ' j • Mr. Slimit Kumar;.Sirigh' Mr. An.anc.tSl"ia11^ii;)i,•'j^.. 5:-.ia1:1§11 l<:rliiinr TripaLhi, Mi\ IM.K. ^ahcjiu, .MiVR:l\l|:::iii!gH,i.Mr;i• M5iMql i, Mi . Rnrriesl'i K.. ,Mishra, Mr.|, Sui-ei.ider•Pandll:.j. Mi'. .Navjyl-i^unirii, MI-; ,Mahelicira;Siny.l 1,.'Mh •, Sun'deiv ijiI, Jlinqj Mly. 'Mi' ^ ' • Bhal:ia, Mr. Na\>iol|il<iirriar'an|(:lMr., Satigii' Cl-iarid '( i,i,i|Ml,n, Ml". Pranesl'i, Mr. Sahil l|;apoor,^MsiS-Fatirnal,,Mr. .Iaqdr:n|'i-Ki .• .Sliarrna, r^.s: r(ani' C!il'liabra, Ms.• Rupinder :Kaii.r.,,..M,':;. I ri id/i .Sal:arawala,.-.Mr. R.N. .'£:inqlT,:-.Mr,.-.\/ika,5Bad'a,' /M!-:''\/.'l'. Rnnn and Mr. NovjotK.'iinlar,|\d\/ocal:e.s..'pi'die :,)eA:il:ibirei's.. Ms. Madhlr Tewalia,:;, Ms.'>Sidlii.fiArora, jvlij.; iViriorP IC Mr.Ai-juf) fenli,.Mr.. Asl'jiilbsj'u'Lohiaarid/Mr7'^incid.VVa /\dvoQales foi-l:iie• I'-esiaofidenl:/r\!D,Mt;•^ Mr. Nojn-ii Waziiri, SlTincjiing Ccnj-i'isiel, Mr, Sanjay Sahayv Ms. Faric|'a Sajtarwala'Ci'xipHa, Mr. Abliimanyu Kurnar fjind Ms. Rqchna Sa>ce.i')a, Aclvoebles I'l Ll'ie respon(jenl./GNGtD|' ' • a (. 111 \/\/Ti, pqsh NanilnV'Mi'. ^^lr.;..'rTaclliri l:)riLI n, M:;;. Navi^alan\Chaudl|!aiy,i Mr.,; 47^S3/:?01:S.,Ui254/2Snia cofrn'scj;^// Sadiil.ova,' , Ml. I'. ./• (t/; \ i : i \ •;'! ' , '••J V; • , •! .• ; •Rajesliwar.; Rao, ; Mr:\ Mohammad, 'AdvocaLes COIRAIM /• '..v' ^ •• •'• II llOWr BILIE MS JIILDSTICIE li:IIIMl f^.KOII-lllLI

¶1VVIieLI'ier Reportei's oP Local papers jiriay '• be allow(^d to see Uie Judgrnerit? •

¶2To lie referred l;b the',Reporte j; or ndt?:' • vlje • i- ,

¶3VV11e LlieI' tl1e j u dg rn en t s|- reported in the Digest? I .1 ! ' -i = I ' 1 ' .M .Vilg-aiii;.//Vggaiw >• pcilicc); IMIIIMIA IIICDMILI. J,

¶1"I'l iii; comri'iorr "iLicigrnerit si'ial petitioners/vendors •as-thie issiie; , dispcjjse/of .tlie .liietiliifins.filerl, by Uir;; •; raised ; Id these pel:iti(an;: - are ' I-or Lhe' sake 'oF'convenferrce/i focKs-'of*W.b.'(G'|v47<'IM/i'n-lI ai L' taken note of. ' ^ ••

¶2Tlie Poci.15 of t.l'ie lengttiy revolves ai-ound an order-l ated i5jp7\2:0!;l,,;bpassed, b'' oi-i some miscellaneous ;a'|:iplicatioi |:ii:e^sei?te(;l in; W entitled Gainda H,arn &;Ois. vs. NDMC,Ors.wliicli' rnattei' was •do.riiipik on 08.10.2010 by •issuing ,,exl'iai.istliveclilrectipns.• Retqi'e-procieeding lo . • ' ' ' • . •• • -i'. ' ' • •; •• r . • ^ • I'Jetil wil.h tlie 'respective, drgumeri!.5faddressec!-.by-the;lepjrncd lioiinst;!:-;Cui^ the ijetitioners/vendors..i-arid th^ , respQTiU:eiit/Ni:|MC,-,.:.it l-)e. appropriateto set out"the aforesaiLhonJei^Glafe ;l.5.c[7-whiri vis lhe ^ boi'ie of contentioi'i and, is leproduce. argurnerits^ addressecl : j.)y l/ptli" '^ides y 'tl^ie SuprHiine G(.iLirl..' :iL(fi99/ :ii,907 Iii,l l'iei;eiri,below;-- • - 1 y " ' • l-leard learried,;couriselijPo-r tPie -applic:anl|s.ajirli |,)crMisc(l Llie record-, ' ' ^1743/2<)11, 5-,254/ia:n i® . Fagt?, ?f t rf 2H ' •1-1 ; ••i . ! I • j- .1 squatliers/.l"i-a,vy'.k-e'i|s,startirig :Fro-n-i K|ie Ueci-^i-pn/irMhecase ol bocljn bit asXi'iJpife} see iril:eriin(nxk'r

0.3'.03.200G"-|bcisieicl'by-.tl'ie•SupKsine Ccuii't in W.P.(C).;l.i»99/;l.9?Ji/ en LIUeel S'u'clhjj-•M'adarr' "k,Qrs.. Os..-ltlG:D. T.lne Pinal judgment: in llif: 'i( Slid I'llr Mbdari' jpral .repoi:l:ed asj. (2009^) -17 SCC 597 and.lastly, llui juclgnieiTt;:dat:|tl;O0?;lip3(;>;l;O'j;iass lihq.cpgeidf Gahlda (jUpi q). ^ 5'., I_earned. Gouhsel. for die resppridenl:/MljM.C vei'iervientjy. (jpp.(.i';n(I llic prayer oF ,Li-e'. .pfetitioners/venclors for gi'anl oh InLerlm -onJern re;:! i riiiiliit.). "tlie respondehiyNDt^tC troVri rernoyii'iL) d'len'i fi om 'd ie sites (.)L:r,iipied liy lit'iern tjll :l;lne|en^act:rrien,t;\oP ari a|^ • I •• 'i, ' di'recl:ians .isaped! by llle. Supremi (5LIpra,)-• • She,'', plartiiculariy. . reFerrc Supren-i.e Coulrt-iiii paras' 40'and '-11 ' j.'. . . . • , Singh XiUi5j;aj;'-.'which dealt;-.Wi1:1 i' .'lI sqija t:l;ers/ wij^ers.and ia-id;fernp|-iaJ pmprraie :legislaLi'on, in l.,eriiis nl' l.ln' 51 .Cou:ri:. in ,[;he, case oP Gain da Kain. d. i;o ,[;li'e Gibser\/at:ioi")s nini.lo by Uim oP.'l;bp judgment: in Llie oP bodan e iiTiii'iPiJiate evic.tJon oP unai il i n )i i/oi I is ori l:i ie Paci: t'js'-' 'I I LI le said ca.'.o, IIn: Supi erne Co.iifl: Piad-directed renio.'i/cil oP iji'iaUPIlorized sqi.inli.ci .••i/hawluii s ' i ' " • - } ' ' " ' wilhoui: awaiting 'Final allotmentoP sites to be allol:ted l.o eligible (.1 at-tlie placesiirer^oiTinnendedby tlie Tha;rcia CoiriiTiitteeor siigqostnd by j!" . ' the MDMC. V , i: ,

¶6Again, ,|n' l:|be inteiii;n'orderi| iJated 03:03.2000 passoii _s_j;.a^_C54 'the f^o11uwiijq ,obsei'vaticin iria11e P;y 111 r. ^ |- • 'if' • L.oo,t wasPugJ,lightedby the conns|l'7qrM:her.Esporideiit/i\iniv|( ..jiji. ' 5254/^^2ci'.i'i .Ce.rrr/tecto./jj/;(ee/s .7' u'f , I. I • I • ! • 1 I ! '• I ' ! I .1 • ;' • I • I! "1';:. •- : ' i"\A/Kile we ;'underl:alce|,tiiis ex&rcise, we direcL Lin:; lAq'thGlrities..to- -see to jil: i:hal: Ihose, pferSdhs, who nic Jcgrryfi'ig oh. haWkiiig' aCtivitieq-or wlio ore sciurrlLiiig on fsdiblid land without .arny aLithprily, evei'i in cicc.oidaiii;n •wi'th Ihe pi''6!sent day:.sclrern.e in rorce; are removed 'rdirthwith: 'Jl'i.is' 'i|i|:rLii:le.9 Mjricii.ith.orized hawking, .stiliatting'diV.publicstreets, rpolpaU'i? and public pnrks, .ih.cludii'ig piaygi^ound. \/\/e iJii'ect tlie Delhi Ai.lmiiii.5l;i"al.ion to: lake steps iminedialely lii qoliaboratioi'i witli Ml.I) and ;ND|VIG with' necessai-y-'assistance Irom I3eil:ii i'olice io clearI the roads/ •strelets, Pool:|;)abh5, parks eU:. by LI iliaLI Khdrized.occ upant|/ sqiJa l.;Lers/ hawk .0rs."

7.. As td'Vtihe ijLidgnnent dal:ed .:!:l.7.0I5.3i:i07:'iendered in the i.asc ol 'i I • ' mI . .. • • . . 5LIdhir l^icidali::",(.5ij.PraV,"rnLich emp(hasis was laid by the counsel Inr l.hi-: resp,ondent/NpM(Con 'pai'as'28,; >t:|D,.•JO jarid -whicli are 1e| iriidinled' liereinbelow/for r&ady I'eferehce,;- 'j ! II'le "New .IJellii'' Municipal Cdniiiriitltee has subn-i|itied its Schen:ie. We I'lave (;:onsidered t.lie 'subhiiitted bePore us: TJie ailea wl'iich fails inider l\ir.)|^1(: . dpes.jnot create problems suclV a.s'those in Ll'ie areas .^uijider MCD.; l-lowever,'in tlie;said Scl'ierne rePerencx: lias .'.been j iriadevto person's, wlio.. do not,, lia've permisj , Liiyider Section 223 or Ijceriee Liridei" Section 330 oP •.NpMG /Act, 1994 but vA/t.io are uirauthiorisedly CC .tql carry on business, as liawkers/sti'ecl; vendors. Ihey ,:.hiye ibeen.described Eiff tirdse whb are "M:olGratei.l"in the IMDMC area. We Pail t.o|.Liiiderstcind-vyhyany -person wim 'vibiattes the-law siKiuldjbe i;olerated. EitPier tliey sl-iouli.i -..be. compelied to obey the, law or the law may l/ie sui.l.nlily ;p. ere ate .;U i"! du6 hardslii|-i. .1he ;cli"essedjb-^-.the legisialuro or th'-i jWe, therePote, observe Ihat-il' il ^isiPelL that the persons-:v\/|-io -Peiij |n tpiis category leciuiin speciial protectioii, tl:ie Kct n:iay be suitably ameiujed to 'Cdyer; their, cases•or-4ls.e 'iihe nUiiYber dP sucli -squatters inay increasejProrn; tiirie. to tiine'. aijieiild'ed^if jt" is Pound, MiiipbleimV need to" be ae i^rujleniai<.in'g ^authdrity • ;o 1e. leqr p2S4/2ax]l &CO,,n^u,,r.. ^•p 2H ; • I, > • I- ••1 1 • r • •• I • 'I, ^ -i. .. i • •" 1 . (r. 2'9.. jfhei'e has -been.' nb,seriouis pb jjscUoii l:o. I;he i-ichoine :iLibnnitl:&d'by; IMDMC. \i/liich is; a cornprel'iehsivescheint;. Ce'rt'ain direcLicihS,hcivje,-howeyei', been souglil; lor Ironi lihis i Court;-• We api^rove ;line" Scl'ierne subiiiil l:eiJ iiy lijDMc.'. / ' i V ' •, • L i i

¶30;It is submitted before us'll'iat tl1e Scl'ieme.s wlii(.:ii Iijave been approved |Dy l;tijSi Cpui't must be subject to anyJAct'Oi".rulesthat; i;^nay belfiarned in consonance wilh the• iNatioiiab Policy ci:)! iJiTbaih';Street Vendcjis. li gnes ;\^/'i.thbutsayiing',ttiat^\A|el;iave,iipprdved the Schenics as frarrjed by :MCD and,N,ipMC. in the leqislature intervenes ahd'l fraiTies, another ;fecherne lor regulations goveri s'uch; . Schemes-, ' that • wijr-certainly supersede. S ch e n'les ..pi:ep a i^ed by li'i"!at! any ad m inis tra ti,,\/ MCD and NDMC: It is well settled e. action is always subject to low that may be .Framed by tlie competent legislature!.

¶35iSubject. to the aforesaid ' rhodiFicatidris/ci'ianijcs in the Schernes sUbniilted -by'Mt^D anGi NDMC, tlie sanir; Vtire •app,roved- .The said a:ud^iorities stiall ;now lake; appropriate steps to" i|mpierrie.nt'the Scheme foithwiUi. In case or .ahy diPPicutjiyfaced by ttiem in ii.nijlementing the scl'ienies, they .sl'iaJI tiave the liberty to aj^ply to l.liis Goui^f^" •• . V . • - .r l.'> . , - ijf y. Lastly; the recentjtidgniii'ii'in-ttie"case oP Gginda.Ka.);!I (sui.. learned co-urisei|Por the resporide;|"it/;NDMCspeciPically relied l -jU, bO tp 66. to state that 1:h;!b Supreh'ie Court was conscious nf tact ttiat. a stixicturedM-egulatioriland .legislation is urgently rci|nii..;il conlTol a.nd •qegujiate; the,'fui1darnenitalright'oPdi:awkinq. Slie also po OLit .that'^ ttieii thiree tiei' disputes .aPPidavit:Piled! byjtlie tinen Chairpei |.iai ii;,: rediess'al' 'mechanism set son o.P ttie IM'DMC .was tal<en ni,)le iil' the Supremeicpi|rtin para,72 or u|e aforesaidJudgiTienI:and h, paia / was i;hen observed as tfelow;- • i w.p.(c] 4Z4iy,2^i:x}Lr2iy4/20:l:.tffl ctJ/rnedfed ins'li.ers-'' 7<.r/ .7ri ;•! y I'-'l.:'- Id Ml, I'.v. or |Jle;'iiiPriGlavil;il: i'las been 5l,ab:!ii hsil; there;5shal[/be/0i]v.Appeila Authorily'whicli slw:ill i|iftphd ..to''We' '.redre^sal oP . grievances oP sc|Lial;tcr;^, idenjis or' any oPher' |;")ers(jri P)y hjiEiaring apjaeals •agaiijisl' l;he: decision oP U'le Vendini.i Gpni-niiiliee(Main): "Pi: raqraph-12.0^ tlial: aPfidaviP i.s ?i!l. uL" below';-. .0 There /shall be ail ./Appeliale ALilhoril.y. On l.be Porw'ai'ding oP :j peLiboris Veceived i.)y Pbe Chairperson, Lhhs Aulh-ority sJiall aPl.cnd Id. redressal ,oP grltevoiices oP sqLiai.l:eis, bawla.Ms, traders, residePiils or .any oLtier |:)erson. 11 in Autbority .shall 'jalso Iheai" •appeals againsi. Ibe decision oP Vending Con'iii'iiPlee

(Main). i.'')ec:i;-;ion.'.': oP Lhis.AuPborlPylij.irilessicballenqed bePo.re a l-ligher Forurii.oir; in any| CoPripietenPCouii:, si'iall be .Pinal. This ALitHdrity sPv'all be ini'pially headed by a riHrsuii appointed, by tl'ie C^bairperson having al; leasi; 1 (.) .years* legal or juclicial background. . There can bc! rnoi"e than one rne.n-iber iVr tPiis /AntPiorlty

¶9" APten iTiakihg-tbev'aroresaid.' observations, in paras l'\ In /(• oP IIk; jLidglTlent,,th^ .SppijernejCoui't weri',t bri,' L'cj .b.bse)'ve'a.s below-;- I'-'' • • . .1;! • ; ••,|74.!•In tPre said aPPIciavit, wli'lcl'i:was aPriniietl bePnie •tljiis (touil" On 24.'"'' Augiust, 2(D;L0 iti has been staled that MpMIC silali•coiri|:ily, lA'ith tlie Orders wtii(.:b wni.ild bn p&ssed by tl'ie adjudicEtory'rhecPianism Conl.einrilnl.fcM.I in •.tlie scherrie and wPiiclijhas been'approved Piy this Coiiil •Pdr the NDMC .area, rinlipss s.'u,cli'ordersare. iriadn .siil.ijet.t :matter oP challenge' b " ' /odheiicompetent Couii:,/ I'/S,.' view 'of such U^s,. 2lore 'd' hic)lier' Pori.irn ur a 11 y . , ,,, , ::-'i'iernes/' IPie T)awl<eis, .sgnatlfM :'..:.ai?d: vendors M-niist aj)ide 'by ; the., Dispute Redi esGi fsqherpe mentioned abpve. ' T^here should not tie ;directapproach:to this.Courtby^'way oP h-esh petiti' ;i11 y bypassin.g'- tlie •;pnovided in the 'scl'ienie I3i5pute V Redressal Mechr Mr-P'.re> <.'/i/7eefe{(majf/efs o i.i/' •-•Jl. , I • I r • I I I , !. .'c 7^:'.l!low^ever,bePnie .SO''' Jui^e.^ Uie appro|.irial:e Gloyernhienl:is to enatt a law ori the basis ol" the I3ill iTjiehtioneci above, or cjiri ttie basis oT any aiiieihInh:.iiit tllverdof-so /that the Jiljawktr-rs:jiiay, precisely Icnow the cbntours of theii' rigtitsl"-' IQ--' It ;.was ; t)'iU5 sought to I'esp0nclen t/ Nb Mp Lfiat;' tliere ca n' j:racle of street hawlcers/,\/ericiors in be. Gonl;eriLl.etl on Ijielialf cW Izie lio vaGuuiiT' asTai' as legulrilim the iXlDMC j 111 iisdici:ioiris i.:oiu:ernei I the failureio'in. this part of the legislature :to abide by the timeline by the SUpretneiCoUrt;'in the cas.ej oFGciincla .Ram (sup.!:a ), l.)y f) place a statute bn. op'&efore' SO./OCkZOII, cai'inot be intei pretei.l. by petitioliers/vencidrs .-.'tp'"'. ihean lat- .tii'ev • Geln.' :continue their • unhind.ered at'aj'iy: place. oF tlieir |clinicei irr.the IMDMC juri.si.lii;:!ii.in, i unregulat'ed' imaiiner and wittiout'iany o.bdl.'ruction. or oti.jef.lio iNfOMC:: 'I- ^

1.1 )(•! f.l I.I II:

1.. Learhecitounsei .Fo.r ttie" leljiioi'icieiit/NlDlMICpai-ticuloily-refeiiei I hi b of.- tfie 'aforesai paras ,/4 an,b :/ d-,judgrneiit ,tb sbite that the fli.-;piiii,: redressaHch|enn^/no,l:iGed'bythe.pUpremeGonVt.in para 7';. wor; i.hc (hk; tliat was l.egjally .Fuhctiioiiing in-NpMC iurisdicijion ai.id wliii.fr wn'^ Inlu-n .note-oFby this CbUrl: in'^the pi"ecedi|n,g.para.'74. In otliei"words, slii:i slriled that the sfch'e^m'e-as setibutin ijieiifFidavil-rlnted24 rifi 70 10 ninl by liie _ .... ^ ' i •• ' • •• then Chairpe;irsoip oF IMDMC beFor|,.the.SupreineCouit in Gciiiida Koin';.; case...(supra).] the one whichilwas.Finally dp,proved by lhe .••iii|ii.r;iiir Court. She-fjurtllersubmittedthafassiimihg; witliout adiriitting,Hint the W.r.(C) '^~^j/:£0:(l^S25:,!-/20IX.S. c,rn"ei!-^d .y t.tl' 7H |:[ , i :l ' i. : i ! ! 'i ; I H--'

4.- dispute redressalscheme set ouili'.||iy.-Llie'iM-DMCJiacI-lapsed on :H.).(•./'()II,• ns clairned!.,b|/tlnie .petitioners-)'-tLie!"i'.the'NDMCiAct provides an adeiinniij l:allback'-tb',eiis.Ui;e orderly I'nanag bmen t oPi vendors ii'i the area. '.'I rePerence vyas-imade iri tliis regardi;to.the .lA'oVlslonscontained in

0.1,1 it>ir.- 221, 224; 225 arid 226:oP the said'Ati:. ' f-I.-: •. .)

¶12It was'^Purti'ier argued iiy tl'le . ' • , • the appiithatio'n Piled ljy;tlie IMDi^^C i l:iie .oti'ier applicatigri ,Piled-by ohe^ . • u'--. .1 '• i •• •i • I, ' • ' alia Por. restraining the'iVespoinderij . .[.i to the' wij-in'eits'cP the'--lucky dravv'- courisel; Pdr',l;he re5porideiil:/iMI..'l''1i' llml :)elpre ti'ie S;:iiipreiile Coi.n t in .Inly A}\ I praying ihHerfalid Per extensiori.dti Lime to reg.ijlate I'lawkeis/si.|ual.iciii tl'ieTslDi^lC area, as per! the-scl iem|: menljoried:in li'ie judginent in Uaindr; i-lam's ca'se'.rkup-i'a),-tii.ltlie ehactriieni;.of ?r law' hy the Itigislati.irein llial "regard, i'lad .not yet iJeei-i.Pihali.y dijspDsed of by iiPie Supren'ic (..^oiiil. at • .'V '• i' . . i.- ' - • ' tiI'l'ie .. 0P passjlp g, bP'tine sta.tUs :qOpj b i-.der: c:Ia te cl .,•!b .07.2.01.[ and s 1n 1iIa 11 y,, "y' • . • 1;' ' bP the Piawkers,''ve.ni.ior.s-praying inlr.h /MljiyiC Proi'i'i granting I'e.libr.izai i liijhL;; oP'lots Poi'. allotr'n'ent, which wa.'-i to hi! held.- oh. •.rXO-SpOill-;.'or ariy-'v'i^late '-therqaPte'r, was also pr-m.ling. consideratibn|:bePore tlie SLiprehm' Court.'.Hence, no Pinality cnnid Hnv • ,• • - .••••!' attached td the order dated IS.7.-.2011 whicl'i can only be considcMi.'.t I an iiiteiiin itieasjre jtill the final clispqsal'oPjtlie .aPoresaid.applit:aticin.sm Ihn' •e na c11 ne rit ;o;Pia, Idg is Ia ti01'i. 13: •- On rnei-jj-s,,|leai''ned'cou aPPidavil:'datejil •011.08.2.011 Piled :i; 2CfJ.i iir, 'cotsne.c •!. ! . •' i r'tlle responderil/NDMC roPeired l.c lli y, tliG Ojrector (EnPoi cemonl.), Ml iMi 'eiiiiinlJers n.O' itf :nf I .1 t •} wherein ili'.wasj;tateci |:KirSulj?iiiL l:b idne'publicnuUce issued by lln: IMID.MC -invitiivg jappliGadons Und.|r' the •' [ND'M'C Urban SI;ret;L Vendimj .Scheme in;-the iyear;'2007, the Jrespond'ei'iiyiMDMC' lind received d. K.^/ • ''''•! ' • ^ .applicstioris. jTiie-docunnents reqiJirqi:! by 'tiie cipplif"'-"'^--' 1^'"' |•Ryi^•tr^:ll.i()n der the ;Sdherj;ie.included-a pnioi'.or age,;,docun'iei'itary proul7."."irii(.l;:;i\/il .roi' tl'ie.purpcjse:'pr;aniiLial,1iiGori;ie'|;pi;'oor'oF.itesK pruuP ii'i siippi.nl nl special categories like-.tiahdicapped;-.Kashn'iiri liiiiqrants etc. and prunl' nl' . squatting in the{NDMC-area,iPan|/.:-in para'4 oP'the alVircsaid cilTi.Invil,i ..the rollowi:n,gi,.criteria approvecL/ajlpptec^by-tlie Vending Coiriin f:n Id • shortlist the eligible applicants is s :t out:- • at the; criteria aiDprovr'd/adQp.ted by tlie Vendi -Ciornihlittee to-shoi'tlist' the! eligible applicants is a' . uncleh- - k . ' • (i!) ri'ie applicariLs slibi.iid tie residient oP Tielhi .witli lii.'' name -registered in eiecl.oi'aj I'oli:];. as |;;ei' aLisi.ract "I phqtd) E-Roi-I di-ER0 Gei1.;iricate:. ;• - (ip Tjl-ie applicant^shotfld be ici MTiajor; viz. with ovei" Iff years oP age as . peij valid bi.ith certiPicate i •; c^rtiPjcalieor school ceiitlPicate-etic.'

(III) Ihe applicant sPiditild be ajieedy as per in,.,. •Iecords oP i..JL '(l-(eveni:e). or: as. vulrierabilil:y recorij.':'; oP ^Gpve|nment oi" l\lL I oP•Delhi (Sainaiik SuvlclliaSnnqnni: .yi|,il.ne|rableand most vijli'ierable,'category). ' ^-P'i6_,d|^|,iUcantshr|i.ild•be registered as per NDMt..' iSIfeef.Vendors Scherhfe.;. The jjollcy veriPication oP thr: •appliGant shourd'be-avffilcible; : ' ^ .

(y) , ijlie appiicont orjl'iis. -dependent Parnily mpinbi'i •sPiOLild not.,be emplpyt^d or should not have any uth,.| teljba^/.a.ri/yendingor Jiny o'ttier 'DelPiiiasper record veri' age business rnenlises icatit.in of NDIMC/MGD. MAP-fC; ^>^^S/2(hi:y2S4/:i0ri « IX af -..'.fT •! •! . ;i.4.' /-\s, per •r, J: / Y,i) iPrefere.hGe 'wiil cjiven/to -,applicanl:s who aie pqysically•';hancllcappe|l;'\)r v|/idqws bi; seriior cil:i^on'^ above GO , years orf. Jf^^shiriiri migraViLs or SC/SI'I Xhecessary.,,i:eitiPicaL'e;|L:o'be 'subiniLLed and relaxal.i'^" 'may be givG;n..in Lhe al^j'pA'ie criteria. the i-espohdenl:/l\jDfkc,the ',catfegoi"y-wise list oi" shortiisted^iappliccihts ifi••terms otftlie aPpnesaid' criteri-a l.otalied lu i' i ••• y • applicai'its.. The' aPPidavit -dated 0;i;,0a.20:l.-;l. stales' Llial. l.lio • - . .•/ ^-•,1' :' • ""'-I ' •••• respondent/NDiMC;,has :id.entiPied.;tp3 'new-spaces,'iri adcJitiun l.o tlie yir.i •remaining-spiliGesidenUPiecib/ thelThareia'•CohimiiiLeein. the men,' whicl") were ^available' Por allotrneint, th.Lis I'aJdnq the tutal iii.iinl.iei nf a\/ailabie spacies to 38S. ..I.t was Ttijrtliierstal^edU;Piatdue to I'aci.ors like do listing .oP. th'e. 1-'arliainent .Street «6"ri, -security: ciro.uncls, cf.insti-iictiiin nP Plyo-vers ariGP'^^etroStations; at vaij'iolis Iqcatiprisfinthe NDMC 'jurisdicl.inn, the nunibei" 0P,aijthorized.te/;6aza|/7isqua'tter.shas'chanqeU Prom .'I'lf!- Id , 404 in numbsn. j The ;hun-iber QP-aplplicants,who TPie resriondtinl/N! )M(. claims,-'areyj6ncl|ing.Linauthorisedl|//btCorinatightPlace, Sainjini Nngar, i-diliaiilent,billeet and Janpath .ar^ajs.-ajrid."ih. wl'io^ie. Pavoiir, ylnhi;.; t/i/n •orders are.o;ppi-ating,.is'-stated'to ;b|s''b23rii'iMlprilber. "PPie aPPii.lavitassni|., - • I'' '•i ' ' -'f ' that simply bcpcaLise the narnes;o^.l^he petitioners,who are registeioijwilli i:he NDIvic,^:Plg,uri in-the:;eligibiiity|'n[;t'drawrftiy^th& respniulei,t/l\ll.M(', cannot be tie|ate(j:l as-proofof..thei|' i-egtilarlyvending in the IXMjMr aion and nor doe5|t:confe,-diT U^ ,.,^,,1^ ,,, vendingSpaccj^TprU-ienrin-theJ\;DI"ijc,area, which is dii ecLly dn|,rn, • • -' I ;-i Bii fnarfe/'i;.'': •'. ' r--Tit;e' .12 in' 2U I'o n , i I' I ' !• ' • '' "f. ' • •• •t Lhe riLirnbGPfif.spaces a\/ailable. •"|hi,.is, it;W0S contended 1:1 laL neilhor lhe Comrnitteeiis the apnella.te possession-Dp.cinjY;numberof chalj|p.ri3/\i"iorU:ile-absericethereofcan nuiki'! adiprerehce/jiforiIJ'ie reason that jchfillnns•cannot",formthe Liasis for 11if! petitioners to ^clalm anyVvested lei^al riqht to sqiiiat at a given space. :t5.- Counsel; for; the resporideril:/INII3l^'1C ' assei'ted that l.lie |)ie.;;enl petitions, areiJhqt rhajntainabie'; inasmuch -as ' the |:)etil;iunei s hnve an equally • effic'acious alternate ' ?ej • I, •i'l.Ot T!ec.ly.,or •aprji'oaching the nj i| )f:illate authorityco.r|stitpted by tlie •CPiaitrper5on,H\IRMC, for redressal of Iheii • giievances ai'id failui'e, oi'i. ttieii-pait; to^ tiave aripi'oactied the Veni.ling on accoLii'it of the fact tiiat tlie said Coiiin'iittee ini.ludini.i .duttiOrity-is not funcl!ioiiing,; bj.it because

1.1 nave m i ' -.1 •" •more conven"ent'. to bypass •the-aroresaid forum a^nd. approach this (..iciiil directly, wliich .is •not ^periinissibljeJ: I'lave been :ta|l<er)jby the-respohdei: .'She state^d' that exterisivo mi!r"i.';.uiiv. it/ND|v|r: ,i:o constitute Ilie ai Ijudii.al ni y. mechanisi-riby wjiy of a; ttiree tier j||y5tenliri 'the following •;l - ; - •••.yend|.ng Sub-Coniniitte^e(Site of Spaces), ', '; '^rr ' •; ^phxlingSul:i-C:on-irnitte|24lleatl^^ and Sub'M:on-iiriitte;|2(Enforce the\Gi:eal:ioi|.pftfie iafpresaid three. Vc^iK.li committees,Ven^lingCommittee,(i|laih),as also of tlieappellate;ai ^-^S/;;|i:,s|titutedrto redr^^^^ grievances of the sqiu hawkei-s,'trad|ei:sjresidefiEs or an,i other pei^on against tin; ,lr:,.i;. •ily (11 of ! '! •i t I i V i'.' I : ' i'• i • • I- ; • the Vending Cornn-iilrUee(i'^lain), vvas plGced before Uie onpieine : Inr considei.'atic ap p roved'in haind the said L|-iree| bier adjUdicakofy nieci'tanisiiiwns (inly tine' judghlent of Gairida Pvaih (supra).

¶17' Percontra, learned, cdCiriseis' Fdr- •the petilioners/veiuJui n, wlm appeared. C) "1 diifferent .dc;il;fe, ydi'ifcrnenLly opposed the afoiesnid si.nnd . taken by -thfe r^s(donclent/ND.MC.'fi.ncla-sserbed •l.fiat the scheme. Honied hy the respojideht/ND'MC:for'requi'aitl'ng''v^ndidqiacttVifies in ils •jiirisr.liciiim had la.psed on 3j0;06.201.1.in the-'pbseriQe,df the -.ehactmeiitol' a Inyislntion as per direc;tQinisoF the'Supi'erne'j|(tb in^the.caseof Gairida llani,(sUpi'-i) and as pn;-c|ate,j tl'iere is no'scliei'ne Ji-i ie)tiste.nce-' it was cnnvasseil Ihnl ttie iiTiplica.tidn!. of the-, oforesaidl order of •s'ta^x/s, Q/./0 passed by l.hV: Supreme,Courtion 15-.,07.201,1Ga|n only.,mean that irrespecUveuT the I'm: I V,' ,•;"i- '• I . • . •, • Jj •, .whether l:h|i.',S(l:|uattin,gis-legal'for illegal, ,tlie sairie be i.ierniitled In continue on an 'as is vvbiere isj basis, anul such sL'atiis qun is Iti bn nidintained by. alb tl'ie pai'ties till,a;law is: framed by bi'ie lo.igislal.i.ir'e..

¶18Mr. Sawhney, ,' -!: .. )i.. • Advocate' api;;earing. fi.ir lln-petitionef5/\jen(:|drsubinittedth^t^in the case of Gainda Ram (suma). tliM Supieme directed thati'tlie,,'appropriategovernmentmiisl. en.n.l alaw on or b,^rpie30.pG.20J..lSij that: tbie liaw;l<eismay prei.:ir:p.lyknow the contoui^;or their.,rights, bi|rGe, the, dispute redressal mechnniM,, pi uvided roi In :tlie sclieme rnentioried in Lbie,-aPoresaldjudgment ccniid operate .oni^f upbo, 30.0.6.2011,a^ bbiereabber, the said scheme: wnuld /natter.5' ffly.R f4 .i,i'/'- J!t I '1 ; ( i i •I . I ' ' : •• auLornahi6all|ystand lapsed,, l-le-s:al:0d-Lhai: no ol:he:i" iiil:erprol:r;il.ion i-.an I given,to khel'ord.erdated lb.O7.4Gdirecting maintenance ol quo, in view or-tl" ,e'q|Lialiryiingwords/ "as'it'is 6i:)taiiiin,gtoday". l-le ..iignr-id lii/il if tl'ie .sclierne Iwas ddiitii-iliirig',:lljo^operate, as' claiitied L)y rini nr!i counsel fdr.i'h.e responderi.t/NDM.Qj,then tri(?.i"ewas no cic d reasi respandent/NDiylCto/have rerraiiped trom holding a draw oP lots, whii li was slated for tlfie. saine day,-i;e.,'| tS,07:20:1.1, and tliat fact of' Ihr: mallei is that'evei:H;the.,respQndent/NDhf|C had ujiderstoOd the siolin; (jiin oidfn to mean that'there is no'schemejili place atter 30.G.20.1.1, Cor Uie 1casi 68| Of the ;afor'esdid judgirient in the case oP Ggiijdi;). til at in .pai"a (5upraalL.tPfe writ pititions. and: tlie-intej-'iiii applications Piled hePnie llu-Supi-eiTie Gpi pi"oblem of; schemes;Praij-ne'c • .' "i ' thereaPter.^ ; or.i ;irt \j^/ere disposed oP-:\i;'ith clear a.nd'SpeciPicdirection;-;Ihat llu' iliawkiiTg,;,eind •;strGq,|J, A/e,ndii1g^ be ieqiilnled iiy llu; , by,.the MDMC aijid;MCD Oniy, Lipto 30.00.20,1:1 and ik,! t \Aja5 asserted on 'b|hair o,P the petitioners/vendois llial rr; date, thel; diijectioris oP the Sulpreihe Court that sl:i^l:us ijiio is In hi; Miaiiit<.iiijedtiy tl|ie paities can onliy.be given one inteipi etatioi1, whii li !•, that till a law| is pltiiilately,enacte.ci by the l--'aiila'ment,irre.t.-pectivodP ihcii legal status,'i'ali!the petitioners/vendors'wouldbe peiTnitte.,! lo cntli ' , .-j' - • squatting/l1av|)ldi-i|gat.th6sites thai ly-InsoPar;as 'the co'iriposition1 " - . ' ' j •" concerriGid,:llsn-i^d Senior Advor^ iidve been occui;iiedby them. 'I L''|0 ('.lispute i'edrossal 11 lechaiiImi1 i', te Par th,e petitioners siil.u1lil Ieil llial' " • i ' i-'ie. respondeht/NDI^'IC, Ihc '.lImmiu': f'tPiiK! i.'f vf 7.n contrary ,td -'lihe; understanding pj ,f'V.r.rcj Us4/20;}I'm acaiTneclietl rh^Uei's •'I 'll; '

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.