Ntpc Limited v. Gail (India) Limited & Ors

O R D E R %

25.10.2016

¶1It is stated by Mr. Vikas Singh, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the Petitioner that in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Northern Coalfields Limited v. Heavy Engineering Corporation Limited

(2016) 8 SCC 685, the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 ('Act') will not apply to the Permanent Machinery of Arbitration (PMA) and therefore, the Petitioner would have to seek remedies outside of the Act. He accordingly seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to seek other appropriate remedies in accordance with law.

O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 123/2016

¶2The petition and the application are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the Petitioner to seek other appropriate remedies in accordance with law.

¶3At the oral request of Mr. Vikas Singh, the interim order passed by this Court on 5th August, 2015 is directed to continue till 3rd November, 2016.

¶4It is made clear that the extension of the interim order dated 5th August, 2015 should not be construed as the expression of any opinion by this Court as far as the merits of the Petitioner's prayer for interim relief is concerned.

¶5Order dasti.

OCTOBER 25, 2016

S. MURALIDHAR, J. b'nesh

O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 123/2016

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 123/2016 & IA No.25753/2015 NTPC LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikas Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mohit K. Shah & Mr. M.K. Jha, Advocates. versus GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Yoginder Handoo, Ms. Rhea Verma, Mr. Nishant Kumar & Ms. Natasha Thakur, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR