- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 15 November 2011
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 3005/2010
Judgment
ORDER
15.1L2011 This is a petition for quashing of complaint No. 49/10/10 and the summoning order dated 19"^ February, 2010 wherein summons were issued by the Court to the petitioner under Section 135 read with section 151 of the Electricity Act. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent. The petitioner has challenged the impugned order and has taken me through various documents on record. I am of the view that all the questions which are sought to be raised by the petitioner in the present proceedings are the disputed questions of facts which require elaborate trial and would require determination on the basis of facts, and cannot be enquired and gone into by the court in these proceedings. I am informed that the matter is listed before the trial court for consideration on charges. The petitioner would be at liberty to present all these documents and arguments based on facts and law before the trial court who will consider the same at the time of consideration of charges / Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. i .A I against the petitioner. The observationsmade here will not tantamountto any expression h on the merit of the case. With these observations, the petition is disposed of. M.L. MEHTA,J NOVEMBER 15,2011 'raj'
Case details
Parties and counsel
A $-41 + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 3005/2010 VIJAY AHUJA Petitioner Through Mr. D.D. Singh, Advocate versus BSES YAMMUNA POWER LTD Respondent Through Mr. Manish Srivastava, Mr. Sanjeet Ranjan and Mr. Kapil, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.