- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 23 August 2013
- Bench
- S. Ravindra Biiat
- Case no.
- FAO(OS) 378/2013
Judgment
ORDER %
23.08.2013 Duringthe courseofhearing,learnedcounselfor the respondentswho appears on advancenoticesubmittedthat the propertyin questionhas since been sold as the impugnedorderhad relievedit ofthe rigoursofSection52 ofthe 1ransferofPropertyAct, and that he would be disclosingthe same in the courseofthe proceedingsbeforethe learnedSingle.Tudge. In the light of this development and after some submissions, Sh. Mohit Chaudhary,Advocatesoughtlibertyto withdrawthe appealbut at the same time approachthe learned Single Judge for appropriateorders in the light of the statement made by the respondents/defendantsthrough his counsel. Liberty granted. It is open to the appellantto seek suitableorders in the light of the Signed By:RAM DATT Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. 7^ statementmade by the defendants/respondents.71ie appeal is accordingly dismissedas withdrawnbutwith libertyas stated. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J /AZIRI, J AUGUST 23, 2013 'ajk'
Case details
Parties and counsel
$-8 •= IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + 1"A0(0S) 378/2013, C.M. APPL.12822/2013 (for condonation of delay), 12823/2013(for stay) & 12824/2013(forexemption) SARDARBALVINDERSINGH&ANR Appellants Through; Sh. Mohit Chaudhary,Advocate. versus SH. P.N. MALHOTRA&ORS Respondents Through ; Sh. Jitender Chaudhary,Advocate, for Defendant Nos. 1, 2 and 3/Caveator. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BIIAT HON'BIJi; MR. .TUSTICE NA.IMI WAZIRI
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.