VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Rajiv Sanghi & Ors v. Punjab & Sind Bank & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
24 October 2011
Bench
Valmiki J. Mehtaauthor
Case no.
RFA 444/2011

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Valmiki J. Mehta

Judgment

ORDER o/o

24.LO'2Oll Respondent no.1/bank has received an amount of Rs.5 lacs in full and _ final settlement of dues under the subject money decree. Learned counsel t \ for the bank also confirms this aspect. Since the dues in the account have been cleared off, learned counsel for the bank states that the bank will not pursue the execution proceedings filed before the DRT with respect to the subject account, In view of the above, nothing remains to be decided in these appeals which are accordingly disposed of as infructuous. The next date before the Registrar i.e.31.1.2012 in RFA 846/2010 stands cancelled. \f"l^t%-- ocroBER 24, ?OLL ib vALMtKt J. MEHTA,J Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

Case details

Parties and counsel

$-17 & 18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 846/20LO JAI GOPAL MANOHAR LAL ...., Appellant Through: None. VCTSUS PUNJAB & SIND BANK & ORS ...., Respondent Through: Mr. AjaY Bahl, Adv. for R-1. Mr. P.R,Sikka, Advocate for R-2 i and 3. + R,FA 444I2OLL RAJIV SANGHI & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. P.R.Sikka, Adv. VCTSUS PUNJAB & SIND BANK & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Bahl, R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.