Mukesh Gupta v. State

ORDER

10.10.2012 Bail application No. 1132/2012 has been filed by Pushpa Rani, petitionerNo. 1, SanjayGupta,petitionerNo.2 and Manju Gupta,petitioner No. 3, who are mother-in-law, brother-in-law Geth) and sister-in-law (jethani)respectivelyof the complainantRohini Goel, who had lodgedthe FIR No.178/2012.P.S. Nangloi u/s 406/498A/34against her husband and her in-laws. Bail appHcation No. 1133/2012 has been filed by the petitioner Mukesh Gupta, who is the husband of the complainantin case FIR No. 178/2012, P.S. Nangloi. It was agreedby the partieson the last date ofhearingi.e. 07.09.2012 that Rs. 1 lac would be given to the complainantby the petitioners,at this stage, whichwas acceptableto the complainant.Accordingly,adraftofRs. 1 lac bearing No.882542 drawn on Citi Bank, has been brought by the petitioner/Mukeshand handed over to the complainantwhich is given and acceptedwithoutprejudiceto the rights and contentionsof the respective parties. Considering the facts and circumstances,petitioners in both the petitionsare admittedto anticipatorybail and in the event of their arrest, they shall be released on bail on furnishingpersonal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/-each with one surety of the like amount to the satisfactionof concernedlO/SHO. Petitionersare directedto join the investigationas and whenrequiredby the InvestigatingOfficer. Boththe petitionsstanddisposedof RANI, J OCTOBER 10, 2012 'mr' 'S

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1132/2012 PUSHPA RANI & ORS Through: Petitioners Mr.Hasan Anzar and Mr.Osama Suhail, Advocates. + % STATE versus Respondent Through: Mr. NavinSharma,APP for the State Ms.Kiran Dharam, Advocate with complainant in person. BAIL APPLN. 1133/2012 MUKESH GUPTA Petitioner Through: Mr.HasanAnzarandMr.Osama Suhail, Advocates. STATE versus Respondent Through: Mr. NavinSharma,APP for the State Ms.Kiran Dharam, Advocate with complainant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI