Bharat Directories Cororation v. Bachu Lal

¶47%27.08.2009 ^ ^ Present:- Mr. S.K. Kalia for the petitioner. ^ Mr. H.K. Chaturvedifor the respondent. + \M P (r.) No. 8209/2007 • * The workman in this writ petition filed against the ^ managementis aggrieved by the inadequacyof compensationof Rupees one Lakh awardedto him by the IndustrialAdjudicatorvide impugned award dated 07.07.2006. This amount was awarded to : yj him in lieu of his claim for reinstatementand back wages after . alleged termination of his services by the management of the i respondentw.e.f. 09.03.2000 after he had worked for about 16 years with the respondentNo. 1management. The petitionerhas prayedfor his reinstatementand bacl<wages. . . The managementof respondenthas also filed aseparatewrit petitionbeing W.P. (C.) No. 6473/2008againstthe same award of the industrialAdjudicatordated 07.07.2006and the management seekssetting-asideof the said award on the groundof perversity. i Both these petitionsfiled by the parties against each other have been taken up for hearingtogether. In the course of hearing, t counsel for both the parties have agreed for passing of aconsent order. The petitionerbeingthe workman is presentin Court. Mr. S.K.. Kalia, learnedcounsel.appearingon behalfof the management is statedto havetaken instructionsfrom his client. Ill/ Dfr.) No. 8209J20QZ Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. / y X Mr. H.K. Chaturvedi, learned counsel appearing on belnalf of the petitioner,submitsthat his client will not press the presentwrit petitionin case the award amountof Rupees One Lakh depositedby the management of the respondent with this Court pursuant to interim order dated 26.11.2007 is released in favour of his client. Mr. S.K. Kalia, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the managementon instructionsfrom his client, submitsthat the Court may release the amount of Rupees One Lakh deposited by the respondentpursuantto Court order dated 26.11.2007 in favour of J the petitioneralong with accrued interest,if any, and his client also does not want to press the writ petition being W.P.(C.) No. 6473/2008 filed against the petitioner workman. in view of the above submissionsmade by the counselfor the | • • •• .1 parties, both these writ petitionsare disposed of as not pressed in j view of the compromise arrived at between the parties-. The Registry is directed to release the amount of Rupees One Lakh I deposited by the respondents pursuant to Court order dated|

26.11.2007in favour of the petitioneralong with accrued interest,if| any, forthwith. The partiesare leftto beartheirown costs. A copy'of this order be kept in the file of W.P.(C.) No. | ' ' • ^ • jj 6473/2008which has also been disposedof by this common order. | AUGUST27, 2009 S.N.AGGARWAL,J •bsr' W.P.fC.)No. 8209/2007 page 2 of2