Mohd Naseem & Anr v. State & Anr

ORDER

22.11.2011 By this petition the Petitioners seeks quashing of FIR No. 49/20llunder Sections 420/468/4711120B IPC registered at PS Greater Kailash on the basis that the parties have compromised the matter. The Respondent No. 2, 3 & 4 who are brothers and sister are present in person and are identified by the counsel. They state that they had filed this complaint against the Petitioners and their elder brother Harminder Singh Kher. They further state that the Harminder Singh Kher is not available as he has sold the ground portion of the property, and his whereabouts are not known. They further state that they do not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR against the Harminder Singh Kher also besides the two Petitioners and have no objection if the FIR in question is quashed qua them. Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 state that the in CRL.M.C. 286412011 __,_.j_ ;-! Lc I ''•' _, -;-! _,_,, ' ': Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. ',,--...__/ view of the settlement between the parties whereupon the Petitioners have handed over the keys to them in Court today, they have no grievance left and they do not want to pursue the above mentioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto against all the accused. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Consequently, FIR No. 49/20llunder Sections 420/468/4711120B IPC registered at PS Greater Kailash and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court. The petition and the pending application are disposed of. Order dasti. NOVEMBER 22,2011 'ga' MUKTA GUPTA,J \., .. ;14 -- TI G \,__': . ,yrlJ; 8 L. .:.., ! : ' ,- I"

?--- * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2864/2011 & Crl.M.A. 10188/2011 (stay) 0/o MOHD NASEEM & ANR Through ..... Petitioner Mr. S. Tabrez, Adv. with petitioners in person. versus STATE& ORS CORAM: Through ..... Respondent Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP for State with SI Anish Sharma, PS Greater Kailash-I Mr. Rajput, Mr. Amit George, Adv. for R-2,3&4 with R-2,3&4 in person. HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA