- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 16 November 2011
- Bench
- Mukta Gupta
- Case no.
- W.P.(CRL) 1198/2011
Judgment
ORDER %
16.11.2011 By this petition the Petitioners had sought protection on the ground that they are major and have mamed of their own free will contrary to the wishes of the Respondent No.3 & 4. Respondent No. 3 & 4 are present in Court. Learned counsel for the Respondent No. 3 & 4 state that admittedly the Petitioner No.2 is a major now and they will not interfere in her happy married peaceful life. Learned counsel for the Respondent No.2 State of Kamataka states that the statement of Petitioner No.2 would be recorded at Delhi itself by the Investigating Officer and the investigation will be finalized thereafter. W.P.(CRL) 1198/2011 page 1 of2 In view of the statement of the learned counsel for the Respondent No.2, and 3 & 4, the Petitioners who are present in Court seek leave to withdraw the present petition. Petition is dismissed as not pressed. Order dasti to all the parties. ^MUKTAGUPTA,J NOVEMBER 16,2011 'ga' W.P.(CRL) 1198/2011 page 2 of2
Case details
Parties and counsel
$-42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1198/2011 SANTOSH KUMAR &ORS. Petitioner Through Mr. Amit Raghav, Mr. Jatin Rajput, Advs. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Respondent Through Mr. Dayan Krishnan, ASC for State Mr. V.N. Raghupathy, Adv. for R-2. Ms. Radha, Adv. for R-3&4. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.