- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 30 October 2012
- Bench
- V.K. Shali
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 2692/2012
Judgment
ORDER %
30.10.2012 Learned senior counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this petitionwith libertyto file an appropriateapplicationseekingexemptionfrom personal appearanceof the petitionersbefore the learnedtrial court. Learned senior counsel has further contended that since both the petitioners are government servants, therefore, they 'A •% may be exempted from personal appearance. As and when an applicationseeking exemptionis filed on behalfofthe petitionersalongwithaVakalatnamaduly authorising the Advocateto representthem and the fact that the petitionershall not dispute their identity,the learned trial court shall pass appropriateorders consideringthe grant of exemption. Howeverthis ordershallnot be construedas limitingthe powerofthe Court to requirethe presenceofthe petitionerson any daythetrialCourtwantsthemto appear. With theseobservations,the petitionstandsdismissedas withdrawn. V.K. SHALI, J OCTOBER 30,2012
Case details
Parties and counsel
•J , ;A ' < .•jf '1 / •' V •< * 17,18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2692/2012 REVA BAHADUR Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil Kher, Sr. Adv with Mr. Aditya Sharma, Adv. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS Respondent y, Through: Mr. SunilSharma,APP for State. + CRL.M.C. 2693/2012 VIJAY SACHDEVA Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil Kher, Sr. Adv with Mr. Aditya Sharma, Adv. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.