Manikaran Tourist Service v. Urmila Kochhar @ Urmila Devi

ORDER %

25.L1.2010 I CM 2020712010 in RC.Rev.202l2010 By way of present application, respondent/applicant has stated that petitioner has not paid rent for the month of October, 2010 till date, as such there is a breach of undertaking. Learned counsel for the petitioner.clarified that due to certain reasons, rent could not be paid. It is stated that rent was to be paid by 7tn of November and accordingly _ cheque was sent on 5th November, 2010 which was refused by r-G respondent. Thereafter, on 10th November, 20L0, money order was sent. Even that was also refused. Today cash amount of Rs.390/- is paid to the son of respondent who is present in court. Petitioner is warned to be careful in future. Learned counsel for respondent has provided saving bank _/ account number of the respondent and the name of the bank where ( petitioner can deposit the rent in future. Same is as under:- Saving A/c No. : 0L48000100328799 Name of Bank : Punjab National Bank, Kirti Nagar Branch, Delhi. Petitioner has agreed for the same. Application stands disPosed of. v/1./ VEENA BIRBALJ NOVEMBER 25,2010 ssb 'l D

{> I7 % r.10.2010 Present: Mr. Hitender Kapur, Adv. for the petitioner along with Mr. Paramjeet Singh on behalf of petitioner. Mr. Girish Aggarwal, Adv. for respondent along with respondent. + RCR No. 20212010 & CM No. 15571/2010 J Learned counsel for petitioner states that petitioner does not press this petition on merit and prays that petitioner may be given time till 30tl' September,2012 to vacate the premises in question. Learned counsel for respondent has no objection, if petitioner is granted time till 30th September,2012 to vacate the premises in question. In view of statement given by learned counsel for both parties, I I I petition as well as pending application stand disposed of. ,l Petitioner is granted time till 30th September, 2012 to vacate the , premises in question, subject to the filing of usual undertaking by I t petitioner, within a week with copy to respondent. In the meanwhile, respondcnt shall not execute the eviction order, II till the next date of hearing. I List on 27th October. 2010. Dasti. ocToBER 01,201,0 ab \\.v_ R-l"-s. - v.B. GUPTA, J. li Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. 2* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RC.REV.2O2I2OTO MANIKARAN TOURIST SERVICE ..'.. Petitioner Through Mr.Hitender Kapur, Adv. with Proprietor of petitioner in person. , VCTSUS 1..: URMILA KOCHHAR @) URMILA DEVI ..... Respondent Through Mr.Girish Aggarwal with. s/o resPondent in Person CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL ..