- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 1 October 2012
- Bench
- Manmohan
- Case no.
- W.P.(CRL) 1150/2012
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Manmohan
Judgment
ORDER %
01.10.2012 Presenttwo writ petitionshave been filed under Articles226/227of the Constitution of India read with Section482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashingof two cross FIRs on the groundthat the mattershave been amicablyresolved betweenthe parties. WhileFIRNo. 137/2012registeredwith PoliceStation Govind Puri under Sections 323/341 IPG has been filed by Mr. Rohan Dua, FIRNo. 191/2012registeredwithPoliceStationGovindPuri underSections 323/341/34 IPG has been filed by Smt. Angoori Devi. Mr. Mohit Mathur as well as Mr. Narendra Gautam, learned counsel for the petitionershave drawnattentionofthis Courtto the Memorandumof Settlementdated 9^' August,2012 executedbetweenMrs. AngooriDevi and Mr. Rohan Dua by virtue of which all disputes between the parties have been amicably resolved. Both the petitions for quashing are supported by affidavitof their respectivecomplainants.Bothcomplainantsare personallypresentand have been identifiedby lO/SI DharmendraKumar as well as their respective counsel. They state that in view of the aforesaid Memorandum of Understandingthey are not interestedin pursuingtheir respectiveFIRs any further. W.P.(CRL) 1150/2012<& JJ48/2012 Poge2of3 Consequently,this Court sees no purpose in continuingthe present proceedingsany furtherand accordingly,FIR No. 137/2012registeredwith Police Station Govind Purl under Sections 323/341 IPG and FIR No. 191/2012 registered with Police Station Govind Puri under Sections 323/341/34 IPG as well as any other consequentialproceedings arising therefrom are quashed. At this stage, learnedcounselfor petitionersvoluntarilystatethat the petitionersin each case would deposit Rs. 5,000/- with Delhi High Court Legal ServicesCommitteewithin one week. The aforesaidstatementsare accepted by this Court. The petitionstandsdisposedofinthe aforesaidterms. Order dasti. MANMOHAN, J OCTOBER 01,2012 m W.P.(CRL.)1150/2012&1148/2012 ^
Case details
Parties and counsel
#59 & 63 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 59. + W.P.(CRL.) 1150/2012 HEM SINGH Petitioner Through Mr. MohitMathurwith Mr. Shishir Mathur, Mr. Devendra Dedha and Mr. Badar Mahmood, Advocates versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR Respondents Through Mr. PawanSharma,StandingCounsel with Mr. Sahil Mongia, Advocate for State with SI Dharmendra Kumar, DIU/SED. Mr. Narendra Gautam with Mr. R.S. Tiwari, Advocates for R-2. 63. + W.P.(CRL.) 1148/2012 AND ROHAN DUA AND ANR Petitioner Through Mr. NarendraGautamwithMr. R.S. Tiwarij Advocates versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR Respondents Through Ms. ManviPriya,Advocatefor Mr. Dayan Krishnan, ASC for State with SI Dharmendra Kumar, DIU/SED. W.P.(CRL)]150/2012& 1N8/20I2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.