VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Raj Rani Mittal v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
2 November 2011
Bench
Badar Durrez Ahmed, Veena Birbal
Case no.
W.P.(CRL) 1248/2011

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Badar Durrez AhmedFollow Veena Birbal

Judgment

ORDER o

02.11.2011 By virtue of our order dated 29.09.2011, we had directed the Medical Superintendent of All India Institute of Medical Sciences to constitute a Medical Board in order to asceftain as to whether Mr Rakesh Mittal is suffering fi'om any mental disorder. Pursuant thereto, the Medical Superintendent of All India Institute of Medical Sciences constituted a Medical Board consisting of the following persons:-

¶1Dr. R.K. Chadha -Chairperson Professor, Deptt. of psychiatry

¶2Dr.Nand Kumar -Member ,,\ssoc. Professor of psychiatry

¶3I)r. Arvind Kushal -Member Secy. l)ep artrnent of Hospital Adrninistration ? a Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. +r" ,- The Chairperson of the Medical Board was also given the option to co-opt members from other specialties, if required. Thereafter, the Chairman of the Medical Board co-opted Dr. Manju Mehta, Professor, Department of Psychiatry, as one of the members ofthe Medical Board. The said Medical Board comprising of the aforesaid four members examined Mr Rakeh Mittal on 13.10.2011. He had been admitted in the Psychiatry ward (C-1) of AIIMS from 06.10.2011 to 13.10.2011 for observation. His physiological testing was also conducted. As per the said report dated 13.I0.2011, based on observation of his behaviour in the ward. serial examinations, psychological testing and current examination, the opinion of the Board was that Sh Rakesh Mittal "does not show anv evidence of a psychiatric illness". In view of the clear and categorical finding that Mr Rakesh Mittal does not suffer from any psychiatric illness, he is free to decide whether where he wants to reside. No further directions are necessary in this writ petition. 'fhe sarne stands disposed of. B Mu. BADAR DURREZ AHNIED, J NOVEMBER O2.2OII srb Atl/""t-r/- VEE,NA BIIitF,Aff=

Case details

Parties and counsel

.) vI $-8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + w.P.(cRL) 1248t20rr RAJ RANI MITTAL ..... Petitioner 'Ihrough Mr Ajay Bansal, Advocate VCTSUS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS Respondent Through Mr Pawan Sharma, St. Counsel for State. Ms Lovely Jain, Adv. for R-3 & 4. CORAM, tt Rajiv K. Garg for Mr. Rakesh Mittal. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.