Chowringhee Residency Pvt Ltd v. Union of India and Anr

O R D E R %

02.11.2017

¶1Mr Nayar, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to para 6 of the affidavit filed on behalf of respondent no. 2, Airport Authority of India, which reads as under:- "6. That however, in light of the Order dated 17.08.2017, in the present case and in particular para 30 and 31 of the Order, the answering Respondent offers to consider the revalidation application of the Petitioner dated

25.06.2006 under Rule 16 of GSR - 751 (E)."

¶2He states that in view of the above decision of the Airport Authority of India to reconsider the revalidation application, the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh, if a cause so arises.

¶3It is directed that the Airport Authority of India (respondent no.2) shall reconsider the petitioner's revalidation application as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six weeks from today.

¶4Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid directions and liberty. VIBHU BAKHRU, J NOVEMBER 02, 2017 MK

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2638/2017 & CM Nos.11455/2017 & 15230/2017 CHOWRINGHEE RESIDENCY PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate with Mr Kunal Vajani, Mr Nikhil Rohatgi, Mr Ankita Sangwan and Mr Nikhil Ranjan, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr Digvijay Rai and Mr Pulkit Tyagi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU