- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 4 November 2011
- Bench
- Hima Kohli
- Case no.
- CONT.CAS(C) 712/2011
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Hima Kohli
Judgment
ORDER %
04.11.2011 The present petition is filed by the petitioner stating inter alia that the respondent/DDA had not complied with the order dated
16.12.2010, wherein it was directed to include the name of the petitioner in the draw of lots as per its policy, at the earliest possible. Today, it is stated on behalf of the respondent/DDA that a status report has been filed, wherein it is averred that the name of the petitioner was duly included in the draw of lots, which was held on
3.2.2011, and the same was communicated to the petitioner on
4.2.2011. It is further stated that a demand-cum-allotment letter has also been issued to the petitioner, which fact is confirmed by learned counsel for the petitioner. CONT.CAS(C)712/2011 Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. In this view of the matter, nothing further survives in the present petition and the same is accordingly disposed of, with directions to the respondent/DDA to expedite processing of the case of the petitioner upon receipt of payment from him. HliviA KOHLI,J NOVEMBER 04, 2011 sk CONT.CAS(C) 712/2011
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 712/2011 CHANDER PRAKASH ARORA Petitioner Through : l^r. Dilip Singh and Mr. Sujit Kumar, Advs. versus GS PATNAIK, VICE CHAIR|V|AN,DDA Respondent Through : l^^s. Sangeeta Chandra, Adv. CORAIVI: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HII^^A KOHLI
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.