VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2016 › High Court of Delhi

Abdul Khalid v. The State

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
11 November 2016
Bench
S.P.Gargauthor
Case no.
BAIL APPLN. 938/2016

Judgment

O R D E R %

11.11.2016

¶1The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.187/2016 registered under Sections 452/380/411/34 IPC at PS Timarpur. Status report is on record.

¶2I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. By an order dated 09.05.2016, the petitioner was granted interim protection and was directed to join the investigation as and when required. Undisputedly, the petitioner has joined the investigation since then. Main allegations are against the co-accused. Petitioner's involvement to be the main conspirator has emerged only in the disclosure statement of co-accused. Nothing has been recovered or discovered pursuant to the disclosure statement.

¶3Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the BAIL APPLN. 938/2016 petitioner is granted anticipatory bail and in the event of arrest, he be released on furnishing personal bond in the sum of ` 40,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigating officer. He shall, however, join the investigation as and when required.

¶4The bail application stands disposed of.

S.P.GARG, J. NOVEMBER 11, 2016 / tr BAIL APPLN. 938/2016

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 938/2016 ABDUL KHALID ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.F.Haq, Advocate. versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Amit Gupta, APP with ASI Onkar Singh, PS T.Pur. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.