- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 18 November 2010
- Bench
- Indermeet Kaur
- Case no.
- RC.REV. 217/2010
Judgment
ORDER
18.11.2010 RC.REV. No. 217120L0 & CM No. 16426/2010 After some arguments, it is stated that petitioners do not want to press the petition on merits and it is prayed that petitioner may be given time till 31.05.2012 to vacate the - premises in question. Respondent is also present with the counsel. Under the . instructions from respondent, learned counsel for respondent has stated that respondent has no objection if petitioner is given time to vacate the premises by 31.05.2012. In view of above statement of parties, present petition and stay application stand disposed of. As agreed between the Through : VCTSUS RISHI PAL SHARMA Through : o o/o RC.REV. 2L7I2OLO Page I of 2 Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. \ ;i ; parties, petitioner is granted time till 31.05 .2072 to vacate the I I premises in question, subject to filing usual undertaking by I petitioner within four weeks. i I I In the meanwhile, respondent shall not execu'te the eviction order till the next date of hearing. : List on 2I.L2.2010. i Dasti VEENA BIRBAL, I NOVEMBER 18, 2O1O ' kks teivl+'f 6/4 /-14*v/v'/ A z .F RC.REV. 2L7I2OLO
Case details
Parties and counsel
5. X IN THE HIGH COURT OF + RC.REV. 2L7I2OLO PREM KHANDELWAL & ANR DELHI AT NEW DELHI Mr N K Khetaili:H3li,lin petitioner no. 1 in person Mr. R.s. rata, A;,lTP't?:dent respondent in person CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTTCE VEENA BTRBAL
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.