- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 15 November 2011
- Bench
- Sunil Gaur
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 6803/2011
Judgment
ORDER
15.1L.20t 1
¶1ln this petition, the grievance of the petitioner is that petitioner's application of 0r.02.20r1 (Annexure p-3) to record petitioner's possession in respect of crop of rabi, 20ll over land Khasra No.I07 /412 (2-t7), 7lZ (1-09), L}gls/2 (0-13) situated at Village Karala, Delhi, has not been decided till date.
¶2ln this regard learned counsel for the petitioner draws the attention of this Court to Annexure p-4 and states that respondent No.5/reh sildar, saraswati vihar, Delhi, has not decided petitioner's application of 01.02 .20L1 (Annexure p-3).
¶3counsel appearing for the respondents states that the aforesaid application (Annexure p-3) of the petitioner would be decided within 2 weeks. \- W.P.(C) No.6803/20L1 Page 1-Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. { ,1
¶4ln view of the aforesaid stand taken by respondents' counsel, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.5 to decide petitioner's application of 01.02.20Lr (Annexure P-3) within 2 weeks positively in accordance with law. NOVEMBER I.5, 2OI.1. rs W.P.(C) No.6803/201L Page 2
Case details
Parties and counsel
Vo $-2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + w.P.(c) 6803120Lr VUAY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. V. P. Rana, Advocate verdus GOW. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Kumar Dadhich, Advocate for Mr,Sachin Chopra, Advocate, CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTTCE SUNTL GAUR
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.