Anil @ Pani v. The State NCT of Delhi

I % 03.09.2009 Present: None for the Petitioner. Mr Amit Sharma, Addi. Public Prosecutor for the respondent-State. + Crl.M.A. 102 71/2009 (exemption) in Bail Appin. 1722/2009 Allowed, subject to the petitioner filing the certified copies of D the annexures as soon as the same are made available. Application stands disposed of. Bail Appin. 1722/2009 The matter was passed over once. Even in the second call, there is no appearance on behalf of the Petitioner. In the interest of justice, renotify on 17.11.2009. \ I %, 3 L.IJI-/ / SEPTEMBER 03, 2009 RAJIV SHAKDHER, J 10 kk At this stage Mr Ajit Nayar, Advocate for the petitioner has mentioned the matter. He submits that since he was caught in a traffic jam and hence was unable to make himself available in the morning session. On his 9ral request the earlier order is recalled. Mr Amit Sharma, learned APP has no objection to the matter Bail Appin. 1722/2009 Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. iv being heard. After some arguments learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the application. Dismissed as withdrawn. SEPTEMBER 03, 2009 RAJ V SHAKDHER, J kk/mb '4 Bail Appin. 1722/2009