Chotu v. Mcd

ORDER

24.09.2010 The counsel for the respondent MCD under instructions fi'orn B.B. Bhaldwaj, Licence Inspector, MCD states that the stalls of the two

¶3-T-MCD % r

¶1Mr. Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. t petitioners still exist though all others have been demolished and removed. The counsel for the respondent MCD states that the stalls of the petitioner ale also required to be rernoved, notice to the petitioners shall be given and action against the petitioners shall be taken in accordance with law.

¶2Accepting the aforesaid statement of the respondent MCD and with which the respondent MCD is bound, the petitions are disposed of leaving the parties to bear their own costs. Dasti. RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW,J SEPTEMBER 24,2OIO app' D

'( ) $- {< aa IN THE HIGH COURT OF' DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 6188/2010 & CM No. 1225 Il20I0 (for interim relief) SMT. SLINEETA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. H.R. Singh & Mr. Manoj Kurnar Barhela- Advocates MCD VCISUS .. ResPondent Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, Advocate along with Mr. B.B. Bhardwaj, Licence Inspector, MCD. AND W.P.(C) 619712010 & CM No. 12266 /2010 (for interim relief). SH. CHHOTU ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. H.R. Singh & Mr. Manoj Kurnar Barhela Advocates versus ... Respondent Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, Advocate along with Mr. B.B. Bhaldwaj, Licence Inspector, MCD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW