VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2010 › High Court of Delhi

Mr. Sandeep Mathur & Anr v. Mr. Vijay Kr. Agarwal & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
22 February 2010
Bench
Shiv Narayan Dhingraauthor
Case no.
O.M.P. 494/2008

Judgment

O R D E R %

21.04.2016

I.A. No. 4750/2016

This application has been jointly filed by the petitioners and respondents for the release of the documents lying in sealed cover with the Registry having been filed on 12.3.2009 along with the application. It has been submitted that the matter has been disposed of vide order dated

25.5.2009 and the appeal preferred against the order has also been disposed of vide order dated 13.7.2009.

The documents lying with the Registry are no more required in the proceedings. Hence, the Registry is directed to return the original documents to the counsel for the respondents no. 1 to 5 against proper acknowledgement. The copies of the original documents be placed on the file before releasing the original documents and after opening the sealed O.M.P. 494/2008

Page 1of 2 envelope.

Learned counsel for respondents no. 1 to 5 before AR (Original) on

25.4.2016 at 3.30PM.

I.A. stands disposed of accordingly.

SH. ANIL KUMAR SISODIA (DHJS)

JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) APRIL 21, 2016/ap

O.M.P. 494/2008

Page2 of 2

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 494/2008 MR. SANDEEP MATHUR & ANR ..... Petitioners Through : Mr. Prateek Khanna, Advocate. versus MR. VIJAY KR. AGARWAL & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. S. Patra, Advocate for R-1 to 5. CORAM: SH. ANIL KUMAR SISODIA (DHJS), JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.