VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2010 › High Court of Delhi

Sushila Devi v. Kishan Chand

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
21 October 2010
Bench
Veena Birbalauthor
Case no.
RC.REV. 233/2010

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Veena Birbal

Judgment

ORDER %

21.10.2010 RC.REV. 233/2010 & CM 17659/2010 The petitioner is present with counsel. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner does not want to press the petition on merits and prays that petitioner be given at least two years to vacate the tenanted premises. Counsel for the respondent submits that respondent be given time uptil

12.01.2012. Learned counsel for the petitioner has agreed to the same. Separate statement of petitioner to this effect has been recorded wherein she has agreed to vacate the tenanted premises by 12.01.2012 and has also agreed to pay rent/use and occupation charges of the premises in question regularly. Learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that respondent will not execute the decree till

12.01.2012. The present petition stands disposed of in terms of statement of Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. parties. The parties shall remain bound by their statement/undertaking. The respondent shall not execute the decree till 12.01.2012. VEENA BIRBALJ OCTOBER 21, 2010 srb 1^1 <iPc - Vj

Case details

Parties and counsel

— 3. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 233/2010 5USHILA DEVI Petitioner Through: Mr. R.C. Chopra, Adv. with Petitioner in person. versus KISHAN CHAND Respondent Through: |V|r. Kuldip Singh with \ Mr. Harpreet Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.