- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 29 October 2010
- Bench
- Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Valmiki J. Mehta
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 7355/2010
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Sanjay Kishan KaulFollow Valmiki J. Mehta
Judgment
23, 25 & 26 % 29.10.2010 Present: Mr. Sankalp Sharma for Mr. Manjit Singh Ahluwalia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anuj Jain, Advocate for R-1. CM No. 14560/2010 in WP (C) No. 7352/2010 CM No.14564/2010 in W.P.(C) No. 7354/2010 CM No. 14566/2010 in W.P.(C) No. 7355/2010(Exemption) *, Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. +W.P.(C) No. 7352/2010 & CM No. 14559/2010 (Stay) +W .P.(C) No. 7354/2010 & CM No. 14563/2010 (Stay) +W.P.(C) No. 7355/2010 & CM No. 14565/2010 (Stay) It is unfortunate that the impugned order dated 10.8.2010 is sought to be challenged when it is a consent order. The challenge laid is on merits. This is completely impermissible. A consent order cannot be challenged on merits. The writ petitions and the applications are misconceived and are dismissed. OCTOBER 29, 2010 ib SANJAY KIS'HAN KAUL, J.
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J. ! Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.