VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Gagan Bansal & Ors v. State & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
28 November 2011
Bench
Mukta Guptaauthor
Case no.
CRL.M.C. 3133/2011

Judgment

ORDER

28.11.2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 300/2009 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS South Rohini, Outer District, New Delhi. The complainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Raj Bala is present in person and is identified by her counsel. She states that the Petitioners and Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise. In terms of the settlement, marriage between the Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent No. 2/complainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent. As part of full and final settlement of all the claims of the Respondent No. 2, the Petitioner No. 1 has already paid her 0 lakhs. She further states that in view of the settlement between the pmiies, she does not Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. d) want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question. Consequently, FIR No. 300/2009 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS South Rohini, Outer District, New Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court. The petition is disposed of. Order dasti. NOVEMBER 28, 2011 'dk' MUKTA GUPTA,J ;-!

Case details

Parties and counsel

* + o/o IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 3133/2011 GAGAN BANSAL & ORS Through versus STATE&ANR CORAM: Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Rawin Rao, Advocate with Petitioners in person. ..... Respondent Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for the State with ASI Surender Singh. Mr. Somit Rajput, Advocate with complainant/R-2 in person. HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.