Pawandeep Singh Sabharwal & Ors v. State

ORDER

11.11.2011 This is a petition for quashing of IjIR No. 17412009 under Sections 498N406134IPC registered at PS Tilak M?.g, New Delhi. The cornplainantlRespondent No. 2 Ms. Harpreet Kaur is present in person and is identified by her counsel and the Investigating Officer. She states that the Petitioner Nos. 1 to 3 and Petitioner No. 4lComplainant have entered into a Comprotnise. In terrns of the settlernent, marriage between the Petitioner No. I and Petitioner No.4/Cornplainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent. As full and final settlernent of all the clairns of the Petitioner No. 3, the Petitioner No. t has to pay t8 lakhs out of which t5 lakhs have already been paid to her and {3 lakhs have been paid to her today vide Demand Draft No. CRL.M.C. 3421/2011 Page I of 2 STATE ,$ Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. q -r 624330 dated 3'd October,20Il drawn on State Bank of India. She further states that in vierv of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. The Petitioner No. I is represented through the Petitioner No. 2 his father and the photocopy of the Special Por.ver of Attorney in this regard is annexed at page2l. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their diffcrences of their or.vn free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful pllrpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between thern, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Consequently, FIR No. 17412009 under Sections 498N406134 IPC registered at PS Tilak Marg, New Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgrnent of their statements rnade before this Court, The petition is disposed of. Order dasti. W'fr'/e-- t MUKTA GUPTA. J. NOVEMBEII L1, Ztilll'vn' "bt''v -.rrY5dk, d$u'ox' rA\9, ,oqo ".62't9' s5.;;*^; q.'ik ffi-o 'r W>l,rK*nln x: {.$5

26#$- * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C .342112011 PAWANDEEP SINGH SABHARWAL & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. J.S. Sahni, Advocate for Petitioner Nos. 1, 2 and 3 with Petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 in person. Mr. Vrjay Yadav, Advocate for Petitioner No. 3 with Petitioner No. 3 in person. VCTSUS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP with ASI Rishali Yadav, PS Tilak Nagar. CORAM: IION'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA