- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 16 September 2010
- Bench
- Shiv Narayan Dhingra
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 2973/2010
Judgment
ORDER Yo
16.09.2010 This petition has been filed by the petitioner for quashing a complaint under . Section 138 of Negotiable lnstruments Act' In view of the judgment of this Court in Rakesh Agarawalv Sfafe & Anr' crt.M.c. 1gg6 of 2010 decided on 28th July, 2010, the present petition is not maintainable and is hereby dismissed as such. The petitioner, however, would be at liberty to give his defence to the trial court concerned' The petition stands dismissed. SHIV NARAYAN OHIruCNI,.I SEPTEMBER 16, 2O1O rd t Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.
Case details
Parties and counsel
t $-20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + cRL.M.C.297312010 GANESH LAL MALI ""' Petitioner Through: Mr. H.V. Surana, Advocate VETSUS NEW HOLLAND FIAT (lNDlA) PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through CORAM: JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.