Sanjeev Mittal & Ors v. State & Anr

e. 2t J+fr oh. 20.09.2010 Present: Mr. Anil Hooda, Ad.v. for the petitioners. Mr. Saleem Ahmed, ASC for tjee State with Inspector Brij ' Pal Singh. Mr. A. Srivastava, Adv. for respondent No. 2. +Crl. M.A. No. 153O7/2O1O LexemPtionl ' * Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disPosed of. w.p. (crl.l No. 1432l2O1O & Crl. M.A. No. 15306/2O1O (stayl , Petitioners on the one hand and respondent No. 2 on the other were having business relations. Some disputes arose between them with regard to the payment of dues of respondent No. 2. A quarrel took place between them resulting in lodging of FIR No. L2I l2OlO under sections 348136515061120-B IPC at police station Adarsh Nagar by respondent No. 2. Now, keeping in mind their old business relations, parties have since resolved their differences amicably. In view of the settlement arrived at between tJre parties, respondent No. 2 is not willing to press his complaint any furtJrer. Petitioners and respondent No. 2 are still having business relations. ;J:, Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. I In the larger interest, I quash FIR No. L2L l20LO under sections 34g I 3651 506 I l2O-B Ipc registered at police station Adarsh Nagar and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom' However, petitioners shall deposit a sum of T 5,000/- each with the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee' Petition is disposed of in the above terms' Dasti. N L-g"-s' offirl-*,r. September 2Or ?OLO rb )(