VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2013 › High Court of Delhi

Pd Goel & Sons v. Union of India & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
15 March 2013
Bench
Rev A Khetrap Alauthor
Case no.
LA.APP. 59/2013

Judgment

ORDER (ORAL) : REV A KHETRAPAL, J. CM No.4473/2013 Exemption granted subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CM No.4472/2013

¶1By way of the present application, the Appellants seeks condonation of 730 days delay in re-filing the Appeal on the ground of illness of the counsel. The application is supported by the Affidavit of the counsel Shri L.B. Rai, Advocate.

¶2For the reason stated in the application, the delay in re-filing the Appeal is condoned subject to the condition that the Appellant shall not be entitled to interest for the aforesaid Page 1 of3 • period.

¶3Application stands disposed of accordingly. CM No.447112013

¶1By way of the present application, the Appellant seeks condonation of delay in filing the Appeal. The Appellant has stated on Affidavit that he was unaware of his legal right to file an Appeal and on coming to know about his right to file Appeal from other villagers, he immediately filed the same.

¶2For the reason stated in the application, the delay in filing the Appeal is condoned subject to the condition that the Appellant shall not be entitled to interest for the aforesaid period.

¶3Application stands disposed of accordingly. LA.APP. 59/2013

¶1The learned counsel for the Appellant states, and it is not disputed by the Respondents, that the present case is covered by the judgment of this Court rendered in 'Jamna Vs. Union of India and Ors' in LPA No.784/2005 rendered on gth July, 2011 and that compensation in this Appeal can reasonably be assessed in terms of the said judgment.

¶2The notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act in the present case is dated 25th February, 1997 pertaining to Village Mundka, Delhi which has already been dealt with by this Court in Jamna's case (Supra). The relevant portion of the judgment in Jamna's case is reproduced herein:-"33. Accordingly, the appeals filed by the Union of India require to be dismissed and I Page2of3 .) • hereby dismiss the same. The appeals filed by the land owners and the cross-objections filed by the land owners stands decreed as under:-

i) For the land falling in Category A land in Village Mundka the fair market value is fixed at is 2,49,408. 75 per bigha i.e. 11,97,1621-per acre and for Category B lands, the fair' market value is fixed at 2,01,1171-per bigha i.e. 9,65,361.60 per acre, as on 25.02.1997.

ii)

iii)

iv) .............................. .............................. ............................... "

¶3In view of the aforesaid the appeal is allowed in terms of the judgment of this Court in the case of Jamna (Supra).

¶4LA.APP. 59/2013 stands disposed of in the above terms. March 15, 2013 km (Wr-.,-l REV A KHETRAPAL (JUDGE) Page3of3

Case details

Parties and counsel

• • ' ' .... CD * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LA.APP. 59/2013 P.D. GOEL AND SONS Through: versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: CORAM: ..... Appellant Mr. L.B. Rai, Advocate ..... Respondents Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Advocate for R-1. Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Advocate for R-2. HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REV A KHETRAP AL

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.