Sorabh Siwach & Ors v. State & Ors

A # %

26.10.2010 Present: Mr. Prem Chandra, Adv. for the petitioners. Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State along with SI Mahender Singh, P.S. Narela. Mr. Nitin Mathur, Adv. for respondent no.2 along with respondent no. 2 in person. +Crl. M.C. 3004/2010 * Petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 were married according to Hindu rites and ceremonies on 21st December, 2007. Due to temperamental differences they could not live together for long. On the basis of complaint of respondent no. 2, FIR No. 124/2010 under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC was registered against petitioner no. and his relatives i.e. respondent nos. 2 to 7 at Police Station Narela. Now, petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 have resolved their disputes amicably. They have decided to part ways and have obtained divorce by mutual consent from the court of Civil Judge, Panipat, Haryana on 21st April, 2010. Keeping in mind the above facts, I am of the view that no fruitful purpose would be served in compellingthe parties to continue to litigate a protractedtrial. Accordingly,in larger Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. interest, FIR No. 124/2010 under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPG registered at Police Station Narela and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti. October 26, 2010 ga

A.K. PATHAK, J.