- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 18 October 2011
- Bench
- Badar Dt]Rrez Ahmed, Veena Birbal
- Case no.
- W.P.(CRL) 1324/2011
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Badar Dt]Rrez AhmedFollow Veena Birbal
Judgment
ORDER
18.10.2011 The petitioner's wife Babita is present in Court. She has been produced from Nirmal Chhaya. As per the marriage certificate, her age was over 18 years on the date of the marriage. She has stated that she wants to reside with her husband. In these circumstances, we direct that she need not return to Nirmal Chhaya and can leave the court premises with her husband James Raja. The writ petition stands disposed of. A copy of this order be given dasti under the signature of the Court Master. . .a @. BADAR DI]RREZ AHMED, J l/ /u- [ <-'t: 7t VEENA BIRBAL, J ocroBER 18,2011 SR Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.
Case details
Parties and counsel
t $-8 * IN THE HIGH COIJRT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + w.P.(cRL) r324/20rr JAMES RAJA ..... Petitioner Through : Mr Sushil Kumar Jain versus STATE & ORS ..... Respondent Through : Mr Pawan Sharma CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DT]RREZ AHMED HON'BLE MS JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.