Dayal Chand v. State

ORDER %

25.11.2010 This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been preferred by the petitionerfor quashing an FIR No.492 of 2008 under Section 498A/406 IPG registeredwith police station Dabri, Delhi and the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. The FIR was registeredagainst the petitionerunder Section 498A/406 IPG and after registrationof FIR, parties have inter se entered into a compromise and they applied for divorce by mutual consenton paymentof lumpsum amount. It is submitted that entire payment of lumpsum amount, as per settlement,has been received by the complainant.The first motion has been made before the MatrimonialGourt and the second motion is to be made. It is made clearthat the partiesare bound by the compromisearrivedat and the petitionershall be found by the terms of compromisewith regard to second motion and in case he does not cooperatein second motion, a contemptof court proceedingsshall be initiated against the petitioner. Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. In view of the compromisearrivedat between the parties, this petitionis allowed and FIR No.492 of 2008 under Section 498A/406 IPG registered with police station Dabri, Delhi and the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed, however, with the direction n to the petitionerthat in case she(respondent) moves second motion, he shall cpoperate in the second motion moved by respondent and divorce by mutual consent shall be obtained bythem. The petition stands disposed of in above terms. SHIV NARAYAN DHIN^A,J NOVEMBER 25, 2010 rd

$-20 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRLM.C. 3178/2010 DAYAL CHAND Petitioner Through: Dr. Dhan Mohan and Ms. Tanu Mishra, Advocates versus STATE Respondent Through; Mr. O.P. Saxena, APR for State with Mr. SI Jitender Dagar Mr. RN Sharma, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA