Nutan & Anr v. State NCT of Delhi

# %. 21.09.2010 Present: Mr. Manohar Kumar, Adv. for the petitioners along with petitioners in person. Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for the State along along with SI Par mod Anand, P.S. Khajuri Khas. Respondent no. 4 in person. +Crl. M.A. 15424/2010 * Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. +W.P. (CrI.) 1449/2010 Petitioners are stated to be major and have married against the wishes of their parents. Respondentno. 4 is father of petitioner no. 1. Petitionersapprehend that respondent no. 4 may cause harm to them as they have married against his wishes. Photocopy of secondaryschool examinationissued by Central Board of Secondary Educationof petitionerno. 1 and photocopyof electionidentitycard of petitioner no. 2 have been placed on record in support of contention that petitioners are major. Learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 and 3, on instructions, submits that these respondentswill ensure the safety of the petitioners. Accordingly, this writ petitionis disposedof with the directionsto respondentnos. Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. 2 and 3 to ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners at the hand of their relatives. Dasti. K September 21, 2010 ga A.K. PATHAKJ.