Shamshu Rehman & Ors v. State & Anr

ORDER %

22.09.2010 Respondent No.2 Ms. Fatima Khatoon with her father is present in Court. Let her statement be recorded on oath. I have heard the statement made by respondent No.2. Respondent No.2 and the petitioners have amicably settled their disputes after a long litigation. Respondent No.2 does not want to proceed further with FIR No. 120/2002 Police Station Sarai Rohilla under Sections 406/498-A/34 IPC., Respondent No.2 has received payment in terms of the settlement/compromise and addition of payment Rs.5,000/- is also made. Keeping in view the nature of the allegations, the social and economic background to which the parties belong and the settlement arrived between the parties, I allow the present petition. Accordingly, FIR No.120/2002 Police Station Sarai Rohilla under Sections 406/498-A/34 IPC and the resultant proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby set aside and quashed. Dasti. SEPTEMBER 22,2010 J V --/(C

SANJIV KHANNA, J. Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI I- CRL.M.C. 3025/2010 SHAMSHU REHMAN & ORS Petitioners Tlirough: Mr. S.H. Ansari, Adv. versus STATE & ANR Respondents Tlirough; Mr. Ai-vind Kr. Gupta, APP. Mr. U.M. Tripathi, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA