- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 16 November 2010
- Bench
- Indermeet Kaur
- Case no.
- RC.REV. 231/2010
Judgment
ORDER r.6.r.1.201_0 Counsel for parties have stated that the parties have settled the matter as the respondent has agreed to give time to the petitioner to vacate the premises by 30.11.2011. Counsel for petitioner submits that in view of above settlement between the parties, petitioner is not pressing the present petition and petition be disposed of in terms of settlement stated above. In view of above statement given by learned counsel for the parties, the present petition as well as pending application stand disposed of in terms of their settlement. Petitioner is granted time to vacate the premises in question till 30.11.2011, subject to filing usual undertaking by RC.REV. 231/2OLO ! o/o ti Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. \ // the petitioner within two weeks from today. Renotify on 01 .LZ.2OIO Parties to also appear on the said date In the meantime, respondent shall not execute the eviction order till the next date of hearing. V*'2 VEENA BIRBAL, J NOVEMBER 16, 2O].0 kks i RC.REV. 23LI2OLO
Case details
Parties and counsel
-^i -i 8.* IN THE HIGH COURT + RC. REV. 23]-12010 NK PURI OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI t :t No. 1741e120I0 Through VCTSUS KULBHUSHAN SINDWANI : Mr. rarun oil;;:ill:n"' Through : M r. Akshuv vr. [r'.'[."t,f'?il o"n' Mr. Vikas Bhadauria and Ms. Amisha Gupta, Advs. COMM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTTCE VEENA BIRBAL
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.