- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 26 October 2016
- Bench
- J.R. Midha
- Case no.
- CM(M) 995/2013
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow J.R. Midha
Judgment
O R D E R %
26.10.2016
¶1The petitioner has challenged the order dated 6th August, 2013 passed by the Commissioner, Employees Compensation.
¶2Respondents no.1 to 3 are present in Court along with their counsel and they submit that they have not received any compensation in respect of the award dated 9th December, 2009 passed by MACT, Hingoli. They further submit that they will not file the execution to execute the award dated 9th December, 2009.
¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the statement made by the respondents today in Court, he has instructions not to press this petition.
¶4This petition as well as CM 15115/2013 are dismissed as withdrawn.
¶5The parties shall appear before the Commissioner, Employees Compensation on 8th December, 2016.
¶6The record of the Commissioner, Employees Compensation be returned back forthwith.
¶7Copy of this order be given dasti to counsel for the parties under the signature of the Court Master.
J.R. MIDHA, J. OCTOBER 26, 2016/dk
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 995/2013 & CM 15115/2013 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. L.K. Tyagi, Adv. versus AMARJEET KAUR & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Pratima N. Chauhan, Adv. for R-1 to R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.