Anand Kumar & Anr v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors

\

24.09.2010 Present: Mr. V.K. Khurana, Adv. for the petitioners. Mr. Navin Sharma, Adv. for the State. Complainant in person. CrI. M.C. No. 3061/2010 This petition has been filed by the petitioners under section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No. 225/2008, u/s 3/4 of Dowry Provisions Act, 1961 and 406 IPC, registered at P.S. Badarpur, Delhi. Both the parties are present in the Court today. Respondent No.2, Mr. Ram Chander Jha, is identified by her counsel SI Giriraj Singh. It is stated by both the parties that they have amicably settled the matter. As per settlement, out of a total sum of ? 21,000/-, a sum of ?. 11,000/- has already been paid to respondent No.2 and the balance amount of ? 10,000/- has been paid in the Court today to respondent No.2, in cash. The petitioner has stated that he will return one gold ring to the complainant within one week from today. There is no dispute pending between the parties. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the Complainant prays that FIR No. 225/2008, u/s 3/4 of Dowry Provisions Act, 1961 and 406 IPC, registered at P.S. Badarpur, Delhi, be quashed. Heard. Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. -V In my opinion, no useful purpose will be served by continuing with the said FIR, particularly when the parties have settled their disputes amicably". In view of the above, the petition is allowed and FIR No. 225/2008, u/s 3/4 of Dowry Provisions Act, 1961 and 406 IPG, registered at P.S. Badarpur, Delhi, and all other proceedings arising thereof are, therefore, ordered to be quashed against all the accused. The petition stands disposed of. No orders as to costs. Dasti. SEPTEMBER 24, 2010 Kb

¶5p-^ eg. ^ S.L.BHAYANAJ