Qamar Abas @ Sohil v. State

ORDER %

31.10.2011 Crl. MA 9941/2011 (exemption) in Bail Appln. No.1180/2011 And Crl. MA 11858/2011 (exemption) in Bail Appln. No.1403/2011 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. \ '- BAIL APPLN. 1180/2011 & BAIL APPLN. 1403/2011 The petitioners/ accused are in custody since 1. 7.2010. The other two accused have already been released on bail. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that all the material witnesses including the eye witness have been examined before the trial court and none of them have identified Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. the accused/petitioners. This fact is not controverted by learned APP for the State. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, both the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial court concerned. Dasti. M.L. MEHTA,J OCTOBER 31, 2011 rd

$-1 & 10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1180/2011 And KESHAR AU @ TYAGI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Abdul Sattar, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Ms. jasbir Kaur, APP for State + BAIL APPLN. 1403/2011 QAMAR ABAS @ SOHIL ..... Petitioner STATE CORAM: Through: Mr. Abdul Sattar, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. jasbir Kaur, APP for State HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA