VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Avnish Bansal & Ors v. State & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
1 November 2011
Bench
Mukta Guptaauthor
Case no.
CRL.M.C. 3328/2011

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Mukta Gupta

Judgment

ORDER

01.11.2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 219/20 I 0 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS Mandawali, Delhi. The Complainant/Respondent No.2 Ms. Kanisha Gupta, is present in person and is identified by her counsel and the Investigating Officer. She states that the Petitioners and Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise. In terms of the settlement, marriage between the Petitioner No. I and Respondent No. 2/Complainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent on 19th July, 2011. As full and final settlement of all the claims of the Respondent No.2, the Petitioner No. I has to pay {8.50 lakhs out of which {6.50 lakhs have already been paid to her CRL.M.C. 332812011 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. I lakhs have been paid to her today in Court vide Demand l No. 0677 41 dated 1st October, 2011 drawn on Syndicate Bank, Bawana Road, Narela, Delhi. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Consequently, FIR No. 219/2010 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS Mandawali, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. Parties have signed this order sheet m acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court. The petition is disposed of. Order dasti. p,V: S.c.... 4\ A

MUKTA GUPTA, J. WMBER 01, 2011/'vn' CRL.M.C. 332812011 Page2of2

Case details

Parties and counsel

,.- 5#$- _3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3328/2011 % A VNISH BANSAL & ORS ..... Petitioners Mr. Mukesh Hooda, Advocate with Petitioners in person. Through: versus STATE & ORS ..... Respondents CORAM: Through: Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP with SI Omprakash, PS Mandawali, Delhi. Mr. Sudesh Sharma, Advocate for Respondent No. 2 with complainant/ Respondent No.2 in person. HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.