Duli Chand & Ors v. State & Anr

#2. %

05.10.2010 Present: Mr.M. Shamikh, Advocateforthe petitionerswith petitioners in person. Mr.R.N. Vats, APP for the respondent/State with S.I. Rajiv Kumar, P.S. Nand Nagri. Ms.Tanuja Bose, Advocate for respondent no.2 with respondent no.2 in person. +Crl.M.C. 3080/2010 This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.845/2005 under Sections 498A/408/34 IPG and Sections 3/4 of Dowry ProhibitionAct, registered at P.S. Nand Nagri, on the complaint of respondent no.2. The ground for seeking quashing of FIR is that the parties have amicably settled the matter and now there is no dispute left between the parties. Petitioners are present in person and they are identified by their counsel Mr.M. Shamikh, Advocate. Respondent no.2 is present in person and she is identified by her counsel Ms.Tanuja Bose, Advocate. Compromise in writing is placed on record which bears the signatures as well as thumb impressions of the parties, which is confirmed by the parties. Respondent no.2 submits that she has settled the matter with the petitioners of her own volition without any inducement or threat from any corner and now there is no dispute left between the parties. She states that in terms of compromise, she was paid ? 40,000/- in two installments and the balance ?20,000/- has been paid to her in cash today. She further submits that now there is no dispute left between the Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. y parties and she does not want any action against the petitioners on her FIR, which, may be quashed. Learned APP submits that since the parties have amicably settled the matter, State has no objection if the FIR as well as the proceedings emanating from the same is quashed. Since the parties have amicably settled the matter and now there is no dispute left, I find that no useful purpose shall be served by keeping alive the FIR as well as the proceedings arising out of the same. Accordingly FIR No.845/2005, P.S. Nand Nagri and the proceedings arising out of the same are quashed. The petition is disposed of accordingly. AJIT BHARIHOKE (JUDGE) OCTOBER 05, 2010 gm